The Internship Review
Wedding Crashers hits Google.
The weirdest thing about this movie is I didn’t hate it. I have heard nothing but how awful it is from a bunch of other reviewers and I went in with my bile gun loaded for bear, but by the end of it I found myself kind of having fun watching it. It was like going in for a horrible root canal only to find the dentist is extremely generous with the anaesthesia and is a super hot, well endowed brunette who likes to lean in close while working, if you know what I mean.
That’s not to say this film is necessarily good. It’s derivative of other films in the same way saying a photocopy is derivative of the original document. Anyone remember the movies Meatballs, Revenge of the Nerds, Big, Sleeper, and Old School? Vince Vaughn sure does, and “borrowed” heavily from all of them while writing this film with Jared Stern. The formulaic and predictable story caged in Vince and Owen Wilson’s comedic ability, and for the most part the film was chained down with too many straight men (or women). Having the middle aged main guys surrounded by 20 year olds and yet are still the wild ones was more than a little disconnected, and there was an underlying message about how hard it is for current college graduates to find work that was kind of a bummer.
Yet all that aside I found myself laughing a lot. Of course I had a lot of personal connections to the film that most of you would probably be missing. First of all I live in the Bay Area and have any number of friends who work at Google, so the environment they portrayed made a lot of sense. Whenever they showed a scene in San Francisco or Palo Alto I could thing “Hey, I had a friend who puked on that corner”, which always improves a personal connection. Also the job that the main characters were doing at the beginning of the film (manufacturers rep) I have done myself for most of my life and I have worked for agencies exactly like the one they showed, so I could see a lot of humor that others might not.
This film also serves as some kind of Google marketing ploy, but what message it is supposed to impart I don’t know. On the one hand they seem to be showing Google as the coolest, most fun place to work in the world and all the employees are infused with “Googliness” (a term that comes up more times than it should in this film. More times=more than zero IMO) and a desire to make the world a better place with answers to questions like “do midgets have night vision?”. On the other hand the film seems dedicated to showing Google employees as the biggest dorks in the history of dorkdom (this is coming from as big a dork as you will ever meet in your lifetime) and the whole company as so bogged down with nerd culture and hippy dippy bull that you wonder how they can successfully turn on the light switch without falling down and breaking something. Kind of a mixed message. By the way, based on how much I pay every month for Google AdWords, I can tell you they are not not interested in making money.
The film starts off with Billy (Vince Vaughn-Wedding Crashers, Dodgeball, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) and Nick (Owen Wilson-Zoolander, Midnight in Paris, Drillbit Taylor) working as sales reps when they find out their boss (John Goodman-Argo, Monsters Inc, the Big Lebowski) just closed down the company. They are desperate for work (at one point Nick takes a job with his brother-in-law, played hilariously by the great Will Ferrell). While looking for work Billy managed to sign them up for an internship with Google. They are accepted for the thinnest of reasons and relocate to California.
Once there they are literally the odd men out. They are insulted by their intern nemesis Graham (Max Minghella-the Ides of March, Art School Confidential, the Social Network) and are teamed up with the rest of the cliche rejects; an over achieving Asian guy (Tobit Raphael-no other credits), a wannabe geek slut (Tiya Sircar-Friends with Benefits, Hotel for Dogs, 17 Again), a depressive hipster anti-socialite (Dylan O’Brian-The High Road, Teen Wolf, the First Time), and the nerd team leader Lyle (Josh Brener-Big Bang Theory, the Condom Killer, Glory Days). Nick also meets his super hot but over worked love interest Dana (Rose Byrne-Get Him to the Greek, 28 Weeks Later, X-Men First Class).
They are then injected into an Apprentice style competition with the other teams and thanks to Billy and Nick start loosing pretty badly. Billy managed to get the team to bond during a game of Quidditch (no joke. By the way, I don’t care how geeky you are no one on this planet would ever choose to be Hufflepuff). At that point if you have ever seen Meetballs you can pretty much predict where this movie is going, only with less sex, camping, and actual physical activity. Billy and Nick take the team to a PG strip club. They meet a guy who looks a lot like Professor X.
The stars. Funny moments, and if you are looking for a lesson in the value of teamwork and fair play look no further. One star. I’m not a huge Owen Wilson fan, but I like Vince Vaughn and his chemistry with Owen is a winning combination (actually I liked Owen a lot in Zoolander). One star. I would risk serious bodily harm and/or death to have dinner with Rose Byrne, and Tiya Sircar is pretty easy on the eyes. One star. The team, while all plucked from the Tree of Cliches, were all different, decently written, and managed to contribute to the film. One star. I like the guy in charge of the interns (Aasif Mandvi-the Last Airbender, Spiderman 2, Dictator) a lot. In fact all the supporting actors were pretty good. One star. The cameo by Will Ferrell was pretty good. One star. Overall entertaining. One star. Total: seven stars.
The black hole. Not particularly original. One black hole. The whole film was pretty clearly either bankrolled by Google or the writers have a secret love obsession with it. They couldn’t have painted Google to be cooler or neater if they wrote in a device that turned raw sewage from the Google campus into life giving ambrosia. One black hole. The movie felt long and stretched. It could have lost about 20 of the 119 minutes without losing much. One black hole. Total: three black holes.
So four stars. Not awesome, but I don’t feel like I wasted my time. You might not get so much out of it if you are not really familiar with Google and/or being a sales rep, but overall you will probably enjoy it. There is nothing here requiring a big screen so feel free to NetFlix it. Date movie? Sure, why not. It’s cute, feels good, and not a lot of serious competition in the hot man department unless your date has a thing for blond guys with broken noses. Bathroom break? There is a scene towards the last 1/3rd where the team is trying to sell Google advertizing to a pizza restaurant and failing that doesn’t add a lot to the story. Go then.
Thanks for reading. I’m seeing Man of Steel in about 40 minutes so look for that review tomorrow (Man of Steel image courtesy of the Superman T Shirt category). Follow me on Twitter @Nerdkungfu. If you have comments on this film or review feel free to post them here. If you have off topic questions, suggestions, or are Rose Byrne looking for a dinner date (I can promise you won’t be bored, Rose) email me at [email protected]. Thanks and have a great day.
Dave
The Hangover Part III Review
Not as headache inducing as the last one.
I have definitely been remiss in writing up my reviews lately, which is too bad as I have seen a couple of movies that are deserving of reviews. The fact is just when I think my life cannot get any busier somehow it finds a new, higher gear I didn’t even know existed. I need to stop doing so much stuff (for example, this last weekend I spent in Hartford getting my ass handed to me at Warhammer. ETC restrictions suck).
So I saw this film and have to admit it was much better than the Hangover Part II. Of course they could have shown us file footage of bowel cancer surgery and it would have been funnier and less disturbing that that pile of tripe. However, even without the last one to compare it to this would have been a fun, enjoyable film at least worth putting on the same shelf with the original Hangover.
The one thing they brought back that was completely missing from the last one was consequences. In the first film every thing they did had some kind of unpleasant payback; steal a police car, get used for Tazer practice. Steal a tiger from Mike Tyson, get punched in the face. In the second film they guys bumble their way through Thailand with nary a single major consequence worth mentioning. The thing is it’s consequences that make movies good. As soon as you figure out that there is no way that anything of a serious or potentially deadly consequence can happen to the main characters all tension bleeds from an action film. Likewise in comedy in order for a situation to be funny there has to be some kind of repercussion for stupidity.
In this film the paybacks are back, and they even call back to the last film and inject some consequences for those actions. I don’t want to spoil the film too much but sufficed to say every time the guys (especially Alan) do something dumb they pay the price for it.
I will throw in one complaint and that is the whole premise of the film is the guys get hammered and drugged and wake up dealing with the consequences while trying to piece together what happened. Thus the title the Hangover. This one is more about dealing with the further repercussions from the first film than anything else, and has no drug induced blackouts whatsoever. I can’t complain too much as I bitched mightily about how the last film was a blatant remake of the first one and at least they wrote an original script here.
This film is also the darkest of the three (where have we heard that phrase before?) with guys actually dying (or being killed). That does cast a slight pall over what is generally supposed to be pretty light fare, but honestly the humor was still decent and it didn’t detract from the enjoyment. The real strength of the Hangover has always been the chemistry between Phil, Stu, and Alan and this film definitely captures this. The humor is there, but unfortunately there is a slight smell of desperation as they studio tries to wring the last bit of milk from this otherwise dry cow.
The movie starts Chow (Ken Jeong-Hangover, Community, Transformers Dark of the Moon. Image courtesy of the Transformers t shirt category) escaping from a Chinese prison (ever see the Shawshank Redemption? If not you won’t be annoyed at the clear rip off here). Meanwhile Alan (Zach Galifianakis-the Hangover, Due Date, the Campaign) is being weirder than usual. His antics with killing a giraffe cause his father (perenial supporting characater actor Jeffrey Tambor-Arrested Development, There’s Something About Mary, Branded) to die of a heart attack. His family is concerned with him and wants to get him committed to a rehab clinic. Is brother-in-law Doug (Justin Bartha-the Hangover, National Treasure, Dark Horse) calls in the remaining wolf pack members Stu (Ed Helms-the Office, the Lorax, High Road) and Phil (Bradley Cooper-the Hangover, Limitless, Silver Linings Playbook) to convince Alan to go.
They go on a road trip but on the way are stopped by a local gangster (John Goodman-the Big Lebowski, Argo, Monsters, Inc.). It turns out the Chow stole $21MM worth of gold from the guy and he wants it back. He kidnaps Doug and gives the rest of the gang three days to find Chow and his money.
With that flimsy premise set the gang are on their way to hilarity. Honestly the story doesn’t do much more that give the three set piece after set piece to have their wacky adventures in. Chow is funny and messes with the gang. Turns out that he and Alan are great friends. The story actually leads up to a conclusion and lessons about friendship are (sort of) learned.
The stars. Better than the last one. Normally that would not warrant a star (I always feel movies need to stand on their own) but the last one left such a bad taste in my mouth I feel like I need to say something. One star. The great chemistry between the three main characters is as strong as ever. Two stars. Mr. Chow is as funny as ever. One star. A few really good laughs in there like delicious chocolate chips in a kind of bland cookie. One star. I can’t really put my finger on it but in general I was entertained and pleased. One star. Total: six stars.
The black holes. A lot of this film was sucking on humor fumes, and looking for the funny in anything. One black hole. It’s hard to find funny in a scene where two guys just got shot in the head. Kind of sets the tone off. One black hole. Calling it the Hangover when no one is actually hung over. One black hole. Total: three black holes.
So a grand total of three stars. You can take it or leave it, honestly. If you saw the other two and the last one sufficiently lowered your expectations you will probably enjoy it a lot. If you are a massive fan of the first one and managed to miss the second I don’t know if this will help you at all. Nothing visually screams for a big screen so I think this is very NetFlix-able. Date movie? Meh, not so much. I don’t see this helping your campaign out much at all. Bathroom break? Nothing sticks out in my head as being truly worthless, but nothing really sticks out as being a must see (except for the Chow escape from the hotel room. Don’t miss that. In fact most of the Chow scenes are pretty good).
Thanks for reading. More soon I promise. I need to get back on the case. Follow me on Twitter @Nerdkungfu. If you have comments on this film or my review feel free to post them here. Off topic questions or suggestions can be emailed to [email protected]. Have a great day. Talk to you soon.
Dave
Goodbye Iain M. Banks
I in all ways qualify as a fan boy. I am really into and obsess about certain nerd sub cultures and will fight tooth and nail to defend my position against the ignorant savages who want have deluded themselves into believing that the Star Trek reboots were decent films, or that Superman is as good a comic book character as Batman, or that the Alliance is better than the Horde because the characters are prettier (2009 Star Trek image courtesy of the Star Trek T Shirt category). If you ever get me into a discussion of the relative merits of the new Star Wars verses the original three prepare to be either bored or enthralled (depending on your own fan boy status) for several hours as I discuss exactly how Lucas failed and betrayed us all in excruciating detail.
The thing is I am for the most part I am a fan boy of characters and concepts far more than people. I am a huge fan of Han Solo but given the opportunity to meet Harrison Ford I could take it or leave it. My love of Han never got me to become a big fan of Indiana Jones. The point is that one of the few actual real life humans I am a fan of is the late, great Iain M. Banks.
I wrote something about his developing cancer a couple months ago so I am not going to gush on about how great his books are or how much they always meant to me. If you are that interested you can check out the blog I did back then here. Sufficed to say he was one of the few people in the world I would have gone to great lengths to meet and discuss his work with, and with his passing yesterday the world feels like a more bleak place for me. Anyone who knows anything about Science Fiction (or just dark, gothic fiction) knows what he was to our beloved genre, and I hope you all take a minute out of your day to reflect and appreciate what a rare gem he was; a truly creative and humorous soul in a literary world cluttered with sparkly vampires, dragons burning sky worms, and every other rampantly prolific author of pulp designed to regurgitate every trite sci fi idiom as a bland paste.
Iain M. Banks, I for one will miss you.
Dave
P.S. Mr. Banks managed to finish his last novel three weeks before his death. Not at all surprisingly it is about a man with cancer. It is called The Quarry, and I recommend we all buy and read a copy as a tribute to a great author. I am looking forward to it.
D.
Now You See Me Review
I am at a loss for a clever subtitle on this film.
Hey, I can’t be brilliant every day. Just most days. If this movie had sucked I would have had some decent ones like “Now you shouldn’t”, but the fact is I quite enjoyed this film. It’s no Citizen Kane, but it has a lot of the things I enjoy in a film: a complex story, some very engaging characters, and intriguing plot twists. The story is relatively light and it ramps up the hokey-meter as it crosses the finish line, but if all you are going for is entertainment this is the film for you.
This is one of those movies that manages to hide all it’s plot holes behind other plot holes passed off as complex plot twists. In other words, if there is a gaping plot hole dangling they explain it with magic (literally) and don’t really bother to detail how exactly things actually worked. On a different day I might bitch heavily about that, but given the last few movies I have seen have been dismal and the whole premise of this film is magicians who rob banks I am more than willing to let those issues fade under the warm glow of suspension of disbelief.
This will be a short review as movies that I enjoy but have no real draw into (in other words, not science fiction) leave me with not a lot of opinions. Movies that suck or that I feel betrayed me somehow tend to be the longest (cough cough Star Trek cough cough) with movies that I love in a genre that I love being the second longest.
The story. Four street magicians (Jesse Eisenberg-30 Minutes or Less, Zombieland, the Social Network; Dave Franco-Warm Bodies, 21 Jump Street, Fright Night, Zodiac; Woody Harrelson-Zombieland, Natural Born Killers, No Country for Old Men; Isha Fisher-Rango, Wedding Crashers, Rise of the Guardians) are recruited to perform the greatest magic show ever. (Zombieland image courtesy of the Zombie T Shirt category) They each have their individual skills: Merritt (Woody) is the mentalist (and easily the most entertaining character), Daniel (Jesse) is the fast talking card trick guy, Henley (Isla) is the showman (showwoman, I guess), escape artist, and general eye candy, and Jack (Dave) is the young hustler/pickpocket con man. They set up their huge show in Las Vegas with the aid of their benefactor Arthur Tressler (Michael Caine-Children of Men, Dark Knight, the Prestige), a wealthy business tycoon.
During their performance they magically rob a bank in Paris. The FBI is called in headed by Agent Dylan Rhodes (Mark Ruffalo-the Avengers, Shutter Island, Zodiac) and Interpol agent Alma Dray (Mélanie Laurent-Inglorious Basterds, Don’t Worry I’m Fine, the Concert). However, no charges can be leveled unless the FBI wants to admit they believe in magic. They track down TV magician debunker Taddeus Bradley (Morgan Freeman-the Shawshank Redemption, Driving Miss Daisy, Glory) and ask him to help but he’d rather pursue his own agenda. At that point it is a crime mystery except the criminals are infinitely more clever than the FBI and spend most of the movie making them look like fools. Twists are twisted, some tricks are revealed, and in general a good time is had by all.
The stars:
Generally a fun, interesting story. Two stars. All the characters were great, especially Woody’s. One star. I like a movie where it is OK to root for the criminal. One star. Acting was good. One star. I thought I had the plot twist figured out early, but instead it was something else that caught me completely off guard. One star. The writers of this movie expect most of the audience to at least have a triple digit IQ, which I appreciate. One star. Two bonus stars for not being a waste of my time. Total: nine stars.
The black holes:
This film definitely put suspension of disbelief through a workout, and if you let yourself really think about it you realize there is no way they could have planed for all this. One black hole. In the last half of the film this film wandered very close to the border of “magic is real” hokeyness and in the last 10 minutes sneaked under the wire without actually doing anything. One black hole. While this film was fun and interesting, it wasn’t terribly exciting. Lots of time spent on making it look cool and polished without increasing my heart rate. One black hole. Total: three black holes.
A grand total of six stars, a very credible score. Worth seeing if you just want some good old fashioned entertainment. Date movie? Yes if you have no alternative. There is nothing here to really turn her on (unless she is turned on by stage magicians, which is actually a whole other set of problems) and the two guys are hipster dreamboats, so you could lose in the comparison. On the other hand nothing here will turn her off. Bathroom break? The convoluted nature of this story means if you miss two minutes you could be greatly diminished in your understanding of the film. Try to hold it. If you can’t I’d say the airplane scene where everyone is flying to New Orleans. I don’t recommend it though.
Thanks for reading. I still need to write up Fast and Furious and will see Hangover 3 tomorrow. Lo does my cup runneth over. Follow me on Twitter @Nerdkungfu (a friend of mine retweeted my Tweet for my After Earth review and readership shot through the roof. If you happen to be one of my 6 followers please retweet. That would be awesome.). Post comments on this movie or my review here, and if you have any off topic questions or suggestions feel free to email me at [email protected]. Talk to you soon.
Dave
After Earth Review
Afterbirth.
Once in a great while in the reviewing world there comes a confluence similar to all the planets in our solar system lining up to destroy our home world (wouldn’t that destroy all the planets? Why are we special?) where an absolute shyte movie comes along with a name that readily lends itself to an obscene, biological, or scatological pun like this one. On these rare occasions there is much rejoicing in the secret kingdom in my head (mostly filled with robots, bacon wrapped everything, and women who don’t consistently treat me like I just made an obscene, biological, or scatological pun) and I declare a the day a personal holiday.
It is always painfully obvious when a Sci Fi movie is created by people who don’t really know much about Science Fiction (I’m looking at you, Stephanie Meyer). The underlying belief seems to be that if you just put in a space ship and some kind of alien creature the nerd fan boys will love it (alien image courtesy of the Cheap T Shirt category). Nothing could be further from the truth as Sci Fi fans are among the most opinionated and discriminating fans out there. We aren’t reality TV watching Neanderthals who happen to enjoy Star Trek. Most of us not only watch Sci Fi movies and TV shows, but read a lot of Sci Fi fiction novels, comic books, and graphic novels. This exposes us to a breadth of stories that go beyond the usual Hollywood mundane-o-trope, thus requiring something decent to intrigue us. True, cool special effects are entrancing but without some decent framework to hang them on we might as well be watching fan generated CGI action clips.
The biggest problem with this film is it is just dead boring. Do you know what is exciting in a film? If so write a letter to Will Smith and M. Night Shyamalan and tell them what it is, because they both apparently don’t have a clue. They seem to think having Will Smith yell at his son over a radio while the kid wanders around a forest surviving the exciting dangers of cold temperatures and local wildlife is exciting. Sure that worked out in the Grey but that movie had a number of cool supporting characters all dying one at a time in painful and creative ways. It also had Liam Neeson as the main protagonist, not a teenage squeaky voiced kid supported by Will Smith pretending to be the Terminator. The lack of a true antagonist made the plot seem more like watching a dull episode of Survivor Man, and the dysfunctional relationship between the father and son was as sleepy as an episode of Jerry Springer where the entire ensemble dosed Ambien. The kid just doesn’t have the acting chops to carry a film like this solo in my opinion. I should feel guilty for disparaging Jaden Smith’s acting ability, but that kid is 15 years old and richer than I will ever be (at age 15 I was still dumpster diving for aluminum cans for pocket money. He doesn’t need my good opinion to find happyness (haw!)).
A big personal problem I have with this movie is it is another Science Fiction film that treats science like a wad of toilet paper after a particularly messy bout of explosive diarrhea (there’s the scatological joke. All I need now is an obscene one to complete my trifecta). This might get a little boring for those of you without an inclination towards science details, so if you don’t like science skip ahead a couple paragraphs (and savor the irony next time you power up your iPhone).
First of all, asteroids travel through space in very predictable patterns. Furthermore, the are eminently detectable through basic means such as radar. There is no such a thing as an “asteroid storm” that can be triggered by whatever propulsion system you are using (gravametric something, I guess). Also, I’m sure 2,000 kilometers sounds like a huge distance to someone with no idea what they are doing in space, but that is pretty much right on top of something and if you were traveling that close to any large concentration of asteroids (storm or otherwise) I’d say fire your navigator. Also, meteors are relatively common in space. Odds are your high tech ship should have some kind of defense against them.
The writers also seem to think that traveling to Earth from another inhabitable planet is like driving to the 7-11. When we get to Earth it seems that all signs of human civilization can be overgrown by nature’s beauty and all the creatures can evolve into slightly different human killers in about 1,000 years. Sorry that’s not how it works. The planet is a pristine wilderness with no sign of human habitation at all. Also, why abandon it at all if the only issue is some killer baboons? There was something about needing fluid in you lungs in order to breath (???) but that all seems workable. Also somehow over 1,000 years the Earths climate had changed so that it is a beautiful temporate world during the day but cools down to far below zero at night (complete with snow and frost. I guess 1,000 years is plenty of time for the flora and fauna to adapt to that) but there are thermal vents and hot lava all over the place to help Kitai not freeze (where was this taking place, Hawaii?)
Final thing before I get into the story is if you have ever wanted to know what Dianetics is about but like me swore to never again read another L. Ron Hubbard book after grinding through Battlefield Earth (five of the worst books I have ever read) then this film has you covered. There is a lot of talk about fear and how it is only a creation of the imagination. I don’t know if Will Smith is a Scientologist but I think he might gain some fans from that church.
Sigh. The movie. It starts off with an annoying monolog by Jaden Smith (The Karate Kid, the Day the Earth Stood Still, the Pursuit of Happyness) about how Earth was destroyed by humanity (how, exactly?) forcing us all to abandon the planet (all 5+ billion? No one at all opted to try to make it on Earth?) and the creation of the Rangers in order to find homes for everyone. Once out in the universe humans are attacked by aliens called Ursa’s who look a little like a giant human centipede made out of Gollums and who can smell the pheromones created by fear. The Rangers discover that if they can completely control fear the are literally invisible to the aliens (does that sound a little weird to anyone else? The aliens literally cannot see a human that is not experiencing fear. How then does it not constantly runing into rocks and the like? Is it smelling the fear of the tree it just didn’t smash into? It is implied that their fear sense is genetically created in order to hunt down humans, but if that is the case why fear? What happens if a human is asleep? Do they just walk by? Instead of fear pheromones why not tune your sense of smell to detect…humans?).
Anyway, Jadens character Kitai Raige is in the Ranger academy and just got rejected for advancement for…some reason? The writers of this film obviously feel that plot details are for amateurs. His father Cypher Raige (Will Smith-I, Robot, Men in Black, Wild Wild West) is a general in the Rangers (and also somehow the most awesome human in the history of the universe. His name alone should tell you that) and the guy who invented the no fear thing (called Ghosting). His relationship with his son could be described as frosty, if the relationship between two robots on a car assembly line could be called warm. His wife Faia (Sophie Okonedo-Ace Ventura: When Nature Call, Aeon Flux, Hotel Rwanda) wants them to bond better and suggests taking Kitai on a trip with him to…somewhere? Some other planet I guess. They climb aboard a giant metal stingray and fly off.
There is an Ursa in a Dr. Suess pod in the hold. The ship’s propulsion system triggers an asteroid storm (just typing that makes me want to scrape my fingernails off) and the ship has to FTL somewhere quick. Naturally instead of heading to it’s point of origin it chooses Earth, a Class One Quarantine World where it has the most boring crash landing ever (seriously, you couldn’t even give us a cool crash? That’s another thing The Grey had that this one lacks. Having your protagonist wake up after a crash is dead boring). Somehow Cypher managed to survive being sucked out a hull breach with only two broken legs. Kitai survives fine, while the entire rest of the crew dies horribly.
Naturally the distress beacon was on the tail of the ship, 100km away along with the Ursa. Kitai is sent off with some breathing liquid and a spear (you know, it’s too bad that with all their advanced technology this futuristic society couldn’t come up with some kind of hand held device that projected small metal bits at high velocity. I’m no scientist but I bet something like that could potentially be very damaging to biological creatures. Thank God Kitai had all the best technology of the Roman Empire at his disposal) to recover it. At that point the boredom, which had been trucking along at about a 4.7, ramps up to 11. You know he’s not going to die, so realistically all you are seeing is some kid tramp through a national park. Sure, he gets attacked by some baboons, and picked up by a giant vulture as baby vulture food but helps it out against some kind of giant ocelots (by the way, the vulture later saves his life by building a nest around him and lying on it to keep him warm. Can someone explain how that makes sense?). Turns out Kitai is haunted by the death of his sister. Eventually he makes it to the tail section and has to discover the secret of Ghosting in order to fight the Ursa.
The stars.
I don’t know. I am a fan of Will Smith but there was nothing of the Will Smith I like in this film. No humor or cleverness at all, and nothing to illustrate his acting range. He spent most of the movie looking and acting like an angry wax bust of himself. The special effects weren’t that awesome. The alien looked like someone threw clay at a wall and painted it grey. Nothing you haven’t seen in 100 other alien films. All the other creatures like slight variations of existing Earth creatures. Kind of lazy IMO. I think the only thing I really like was the spear Kitai carried around could morph into all sorts of different weapons. That was kind of cool. One star. The ship was kind of cool looking if you like fish. One star. I suppose I can throw in another one just for the fact that they tried to make a Sci Fi movie and it has been a kind of slow lately in that genre. One star. Total: three stars.
The black holes.
OMG boring. Two black holes. Jaden Smith started the movie with some kind of ill defined accent that faded in and out and ground on my nerves. One black hole. Treating science the way a dingo treats a baby. Two black holes. Dialog from Hell. One black hole. Putting all the character pressure on a kid who doesn’t seem to be able to carry the acting. Also his character was wimpy and hard to identify with. At no point did I remotely care if he lived or died. One black hole. A lot of the film was taken up with preachy monologs, or flashbacks of no purpose. One black hole. Starting the film with an annoying monolog and then never using it again (monologs to establish plot points is a lazy scriptwriters tool). One black hole. As predictable as saying a red stop light will eventually turn green. One black hole. I find the whole “Sci Fi as interpreted by non-Sci Fi people” thing more than a little insulting. One black hole. Total: eleven black holes.
A grand total of eight black holes. It galls me to rip into a Sci Fi movie like this as I want to see more of them being made but we need to keep our standards up. The whole piece appears to be an ego project for Will Smith to showcase himself and his son as super awesome and as such is a waste of time for most of us. How much time do you really want to spend watching video of your coworkers 8 year old kid in a 3rd grade production of Food and Nutrition, the Musical? That’s pretty much what this feels like. I was more than a little shocked to learn this film only ran 100 minutes. Seemed like a lot more than that. Worth seeing at all? Maybe if you have a fantasy about seeing Will Smith with a flattop and/or are a Scientologist. Date movie? Only if being painfully bored turns her on somehow. Bathroom break? From five minutes after the crash until Kitai finds the tail section and the Ursa it is one long bathroom break.
Thanks for reading. Follow me on Twitter if you could @Nerdkungfu. Comments on this film or my review can be posted below. Off topic questions or suggestions can be emailed to [email protected]. Talk to you soon.
Dave
Welcome to Remake Hell: Escape from New York
Yes, in the hopes of sucking more money from the current generations wallets (and just plain sucking) Hollywood is developing a remake of the great Escape from New York. This is aggravating on a whole new level, as everyone knows it was truly Kurt Russell as Snake Priskin who made this movie (I could find an Escape image in the Movie T-Shirt category, but I did find this cool Pork-Chop Express one from Big Trouble in Little China). Rumored actors include Tom Hardy and Jason Stratham, who are both fine in their own genres but honestly I really don’t believe either of them can really pull off the truly bad ass, one eyed, gravely Snake that is required.
In addition, the time is all wrong for this movie. Like when they did Red Dawn the point is the circumstances have changed, making the major plot point of the film (Russia invading USA) seem a little ridiculous. When Escape was made New York City was in a downward slump crime wise that made the idea of the entire island of Manhattan being turned into a penal colony entirely reasonable. Today Manhattan is the most prime real estate in the USA and there is no way the base premise is going to make sense or seem at all serious. If you really want to do this you should make Escape from Detroit (no offense to my fine Detroit readers, but you get my point).
Anyway, I found a list of other bad remake plans so look forward to more of these post as I explain why each of them is going to suck. I might have to revisit this one again soon.
Dave
Epic Movie Review
That’s Epic the movie not my most Epic movie review ever. That one has yet to be written but if I were to choose on from what I have written so far I would probably go with the Host.
So I have been at a gaming convention all weekend and have not had a chance to write anything up. I have seen this film, Fast & Furious 6, and a Bollywood zombie flick called Go Goa Gone. I opted for this one as the last review I did was huge and long and a lot of work to write and these kids films are generally easy to do. Plus I have a ton of work to do today so I’m going to get this one out fast and do the furious ones tomorrow (haw!).
So another animated film from someone called Blue Sky Studios. The only thing they have done of note to date was the entire Ice Age series (unless you consider Aunt Fanny’s Tour of Booty an unsung classic), which I have managed to miss in it’s entirety. Something about that series never drew me in. It just looks trite and bad campy, like the Three Stooges meets Tele Tubbies (Stooges image courtesy of the Movie T Shirt category). I’m sure it’s a classic but when I tell my animation fan friends I have never seen it the don’t shoot hate rays out of their eyes at me like they do if I say I have never seen every Pixar movie 14 times, so I am willing to bet I shouldn’t regret my decision.
So what do I think about Epic? Entertaining enough, with high production values. I did see it in 3D, a format that animated films is particularly (and in most cases singularly) suited for. It was polished and well crafted, if more than a little formulaic. I have seen some praise for this being the first Blue Sky production featuring a female protagonist, but honestly she was not exactly a paragon of feminine strength. She spent most of the time either being rescued by assorted male characters or carrying around a fragile seed pod in a pretty clear allegory to pregnancy. I suspect if they could have found a plot device to have her barefoot in a kitchen there wouldn’t have been much internal debate among the writers.
As is my policy I will not be doing my usual stars/black holes. It is a waste on kids films IMO. I judge these things by how much fun the kids in the audience seem to be having and for the most part it was a good time (also judging by the number of crying babies there were a number of kids who never saw more than a lot of green blurs. Do theaters make 3D glasses for infants? Do we really know what kind of brain damage 3D potentially could be doing to infants? Most parents suck). They all seemed to be laughing to a certain extent (although not as much as a lot of other kids films) and there were cute creatures to keep them entertained (the hand of the merchandising arm was pretty visible at a lot of points).
That’s not to say there weren’t issues here. The main one seems to be the formulaic nature of the story, and the focus on kids humor while leaving the adults suffering. Unlike other recent bad kids movies like Escape from Planet Earth I can’t say this film wasn’t written with adults in mind. There were some very adult concepts addressed here such as dysfunctional families, child emancipation, and the death of parents and/or kids. The problem is these adult concepts were dead boring and not at all funny or remotely entertaining. Some of them were even a bummer. It was like watching Mr. Roger’s Neighborhood cut together with Philadelphia.
The other issue I had with this film was the animation of the human (or human-like) characters. I won’t say the animators went to school in the uncanny valley, but they definitely went to summer camp there. This is a problem endemic to CGI animation films with delusions of grandeur. The characters look almost human enough to be actual actors but are still off enough to make them kind of hard to look at. The overall effect is like watching a cut scene from a decent video game. Ironically the target audience (kids) probably couldn’t care less about the humans looking like humans, and other, better films generally don’t mess around with it.
I’d like to give one more criticism to this film and that is the overwhelming need the studio feels to hire big name actors and celebrities to do the voice over work. Does the studio really think that rabid fans of Beyonce, Colin Ferrell, or Josh Hutchinson are going to come see this film in order to hear the melodious sound of their voices? They are effectively hiring amateurs to do the voice over work (qualified actors and performers all, but none of them are known for their animation work) with the net effect of the voices never quite seeming to match the character on the screen. You see a fairy queen but all you hear is Beyonce. Is Billy West really that hard to hire?
Anyway, an abbreviated story synapses (hey, I’ve got things to do today). A girl with the awkward to say name of Mary Katherine (try it. It does not roll off the tongue. Also whoever submitted this film to IMDB made the really bad choice of listing all (and I mean ALL) of the voice actors alphabetically, making correctly identifying who did what or even what the names of all the characters are a serious chore so I am going to blow it off) is coming home to visit her dad after the implied death of her mother, who had also seperated from him. The reason for the seperation and possible future estrangement from his daughter is her fathers obsession with finding tiny little humans (or fairies) who live in the forest. Turns out they are real, and are responsible for keeping nature and rot in balance.
The queen (Beyonce) is due to pick out a new heir in the form of a seed pod. While doing so the Boggans (the rot creatures? Not sure what they were about) attack under the lead of their king and try to steal the pod. During the fight the King of the Boggans son is killed, as is the Queen of the …? (Not really sure what they were supposed to be called. Also how did this film keep a G rating exactly?). MK (her preferred shortening. Good choice) happens upon the dying queen and gets shrunk down in order to guard the seed pod. At that point she is joined by Ronin (Collin Ferrel) and some rejected kid named Nub (Josh Hutchinson), whose father was Ronin’s friend and was killed by Boggans (G rating again). They go on a quest to see some dude who has all the forest knowledge and are joined by a slug and a snail, who are the films comic relief (rather effective, actually, although if you feel your kids movie is in need of active comic relief perhaps you need to rethink the base concept).
At that point it’s a forest dungeon crawl. The Boggans get the pod. The others have to sneak in and save it. The king wants to have the spirit of the queen reborn as a something evil so he can corrupt the forest. I don’t want to spoil this film for you, but in a shocking surprise good triumphs over evil.
So, decent for your rug rats. They will be entertained. I don’t know about 3D for kids (or adults, for that matter. I say there is a good chance that 20 years from now we look back on 3D like we now look back on thalidomide). If you can get your neighbor to take the whole raft of kids I’d say go for it. If you are stuck with the chore this might be a chance to play with your Google Glass. Bathroom break? Any of the scenes involving MK’s father are the equivalent of packing peanuts in a shipment of clothing. Feel free to skip out then.
Thanks for reading. Fast and Furious tomorrow, plus I still need to see Hangover 3. Follow me on Twitter @NerdKungFu. Post comments here if you like regarding this film or my review. Off topic questions or suggestions can be emailed to [email protected]. Talk to you soon.
Dave
Star Trek Into Darkness Review
ABRAAAAAAAAMS!!!!!
I am in every sense of the term a nerd. I love science and (to a lesser extent) math. I would rather read a book than watch or participate in a sporting match. Solving problems logically is a joy. I am socially awkward, especially with women and dating. I used to have 20/400 vision and wore thick Coke bottle glasses but had laser eye surgery (and as further proof of my nerdishness went into the operation with the secret hope that a freak lab accident would give me the ability to shoot lasers out of my eyes). In college I wore only the worst possible clothing (ever wonder what tie dye shirts and camouflage pants looks like together? I don’t have to) and had the personal hygiene habits of pig/monkey hybrid (ponkey?) with dysentery. My nerd interests are legion, including science fiction, comic books, cartoons (anime), video games, role playing games, and miniature war games.
However first and for most I am above all things a Star Trek nerd. Star Trek was my introduction to the nerd world, opening the door to the wonders of science fiction and datelessness, enticing me through with soft music and the delicate scent of flowers and bacon. Kirk and Spock were the friends I wished I had when my so called peers were kicking the crap out of me in grade school and my actual friends looked on. Most of my childhood was spent wishing for the chance to beam the hell out of my life and then call in an orbital phaser strike on Palisades Elementary School.
I start this review thusly in order to establish where I am coming from. I am sure any marginal or non fan will have no problem with this film and enjoy it immensely (although any fan of movies without gargantuan plot holes will be bitterly disappointed). However, as a fan of both Star Trek and well written movies I find myself once again frustrated and insulted by the lazy pap thrown up on the screen.
I tried. Honestly I did. I have had a few years to get over how butt hurt I was at the whole remaking of the entire Star Trek universe into the developmentally challenged image that J.J. seems to feel is appropriate. I have been watching episodes of Fringe in an attempt to acclimatize myself to his particular story telling style (of course in a recent interview on the Howard Stern Show he said he was not really involved a whole lot in Fringe and has not even seen all the episodes) and showed up at the theater wearing a Star Trek t shirt and a heart full of hope.
132 very long minutes later I walked out and the only thing I could think of was “It’s going to be really hard to remember all the plot holes and canon screw ups when I write my review tomorrow”. After about an hour the part of my brain that feels pain every time they butchered another piece of my childhood was nothing but a burned out mass of scar tissue and all that was left was the occasional flare of ire at the laziness of the script and honestly a certain amount of boredom.
So, Star Trek Into Darkness, or as it should have been called Star Wars Into Dark Side. I have always said J.J. Abrams always wanted to be making Star Wars not Star Trek and never has it been more clear. It started when I realized the new formal uniforms that Star Fleet now wears look like a slightly more Nazi version of the uniforms of the Death Star officers. There was a scene where a suspiciously coin shaped ship squeezed through a narrow passage in an almost exact reproduction of the Millennium Falcon’s assault on the Death Star in Return of the Jedi. Instead of the trademark long sweeping maneuvers from TNG we get either Episode IV style dog fights or Episode III style long slow battles. Even the aliens looked a lot like the aliens from Star Wars, including one that looked suspiciously like a scaly Ewok in size, facial features, intellect, and demeanor.
I’m about to lay down some pretty heavy spoilers as I don’t think I can pass all my bile out without doing so. If you feel like this will ruin the experience for you and/or don’t want to be bummed out by my banging on about Star Trek canon why don’t you got back and read the review I did for Oblivion? That review is far more upbeat than this one. Come back after you see the this movie and finish reading this review. Be sure to let me know here if you agree with me or are a poser half assed fan who didn’t vomit all over his or her popcorn when you watched Generations. I promise I won’t ignore you to death.
SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT! This movie claims to be a remake of my most beloved Star Trek movies The Wrath of Khan, and for sure is uses a character with the same name and sort of the same back story but other than that it is such a miss I’m not sure they were even in the same ballpark. I think in a week or so I will do a detailed list of all the plot holes, stupidity, and canon rapes this movie has but for now I think it would be amusing to keep a counter going like this (0).
So the film starts off with Kirk and Spock violating the prime directive by saving an indigenous people from an exploding volcano. All Star Trek fans know that the Prime Directive is more of a guideline and nothing at all to be taken seriously (1). For some reason they have to hide the Enterprise under the sea because they can’t launch the shuttle craft from orbit (2). I’m OK with the transporter not working as that is a pretty standard Star Trek thing. In an effort to maintain a low profile and not interfere with the primitive alien culture Kirk and McCoy sneak into the alien temple for no apparent reason whatsoever (3) and Kirk opts to shoplift some kind of holy drawing of a Christmas tree (4). They run away and jump off a cliff in order to swim back to the Enterprise using some kind of underwater jet boots (no number there. I actually thought those were kind of cool).
Meanwhile Spock is wearing some kind of armor and is going to be lowered on a rope into the volcano in order to detonate a cold bomb and freeze it (no one ever heard of a winch or parachute? For that matter if you are going to lower some kind of explosive device into a lower level from an aircraft wouldn’t it be nice if there were some kind of way of “dropping” the “bomb” without risking someone’s life? Too bad something like that wasn’t invent during WWI. 5, BTW). Apparently if the volcano erupts the whole planet will die (6). Anyway, for some reason they can’t do this at night and only a shuttle craft can sneak into the smoke. Also something was said about the heat damaging the Enterprise (??? Don’t they have shields? Aren’t they capable of withstanding massive energy based damage? For the record heat=energy. 6). Of course the heat managed to wreck the shuttle craft yet somehow Spock is OK in his EVA suit. Why don’t they just wrap the shuttle craft in the same material? (7).
Kirk further violates the pesky Prime Directive by lifting the Enterprise out of the ocean directly in front of the aliens (why did he park it within sight of their village? Also I’m pretty sure the Enterprise was constructed in space and was never intended to land anywhere. I think they expanded the in atmosphere capabilities in TNG but for sure even being slightly in atmo was bad. 8 and 9). Naturally he rescues Spock and goes back to Earth for a nice relaxing three way with some alien chicks. He heads back to headquarters where the look of the season is SS uniforms.
He gets demoted back to first officer under Pike again. Meanwhile the only character that really was worth anything shows up in the form of a traitor named Hamilton (Benedict Cumberbatch). He subplots a guy with a terminally ill daughter and cures the daughter in order to get the guy to blow up something. He then attacks the meeting of all the officers with a gun ship (why would he try to kill them all with effectively a machine gun? Why not just kill them with explosives? 10). Pike gets killed, and Kirk manages to blow up the gunship with a firehose (no joke. 11).
For some reason (I keep using that phrase over and over again but this film is pretty miserly on explanations of pretty much anything) Scotty is part of the forensics team looking into the wreckage of the gun ship (12) and is allowed to wander off with a massive chunk of evidence. It is some kind of long range transporters that indicates the traitor has gone to Qo’noS (that’s Kronos to the posers out there) the Klingon homeworld (I should ding them for the long range transporter but really that was established in the last bad movie). Admiral Marcos (Peter Weller) gives Kirk some experimental photon torpedoes and orders him to park outside of the Neutral Zone (for the record the Neutral Zone always marked the border of the Romulan Empire, not the Klingon. 13) and shell him from a distance but to do so quietly so as to not start a war with the Klingons (14).
A new crew member shows up for no apparent reason and with incomplete or forged orders (apparently if you want to go for a ride on the Enterprise all you have to do is flirt with Kirk for a couple seconds and make up some bogus story. 14) in the form of hot blond science officer who later turns out to by coincidence be Admiral Marcus’s daughter (15). Scotty resigns off the ship in a snit because no one will let him look inside the the new photon torpedoes (for the most part Scotty was a good officer and knew how to obey his orders. Anyone else remember him letting a big computer run the Enterprise in Episode 53 the Ultimate Computer? 16). Kirk remembers his standard orders of peace and law when he gets to the neutral zone and sneaks onto Kronos with no apparent problem (the Klingon Empire has little interest in detecting enemies coming to their home world. 17). He heads to the planet in a shuttle craft they confiscated (apparently the shuttle bay on the Enterprise now has room for a fleet of smaller craft. I guess the ship is a carrier? 18) that looks suspiciously like another space ship that shall go unnamed but sounds like Aluminum Malcolm. He uses that ship to turn sideways and escape between a narrow metal passage while being pursued by tiny little Klingon ships. They are stopped by the Klingons and rescued by the very traitor they were after, who manages to kill like 20 of the galaxies greatest warriors.
The guy surrenders when he finds out how many of the experimental torpedoes they have and reveals that he is Khan as in Space Seed and the Wrath of Khan (wait a minute. Wasn’t Khan Noonien Singh supposed to be Indian? This guy is whiter than Casper and has an English accent. 19). He is taken back to the ship where McCoy examines him and tells Kirk he is 300 years old (note-at the start of the movie they reveal that the year is 2259 which means Khan was born in…1959? He could be watching this movie as we speak at the ripe old age of 54. That’s lazy beyond the pale. It’s one form of lazy to not do any research into any element of your actual source material but this is so lazy you can’t pull out a calculator and figure out the age of your villain is stupid. 20). Also McCoy says Khan’s blood has healing properties and injects it into a dead Tribble (didn’t they encounter Tribbles as part of their voyages? Here it seems like they are as common as guinea pigs. 21)
The ship has a warp core malfunction and is stuck in the Neutral Zone (Klingons still not really great about checking for enemies. Typical. They are generally a peaceful and docile race). Khan convinces Kirk to open up one of the torpedoes. In order to do this he opts to use his new super hot science bimbo (who also happens to be an expert in experimental weapons. 22). She needs help and recruits McCoy because he had steady hands (??? Are there no technicians or engineers on the ship who know how to use a screwdriver? I thought that was what Red Shirts were all about. On this ship there is exactly one medical doctor and about 400 basic bullet stoppers. 23). Naturally he bones it up (haw!) so we can have an “exciting” 30 second countdown to death averted at the last second by just ripping out the computer core or something (24). Inside the torpedo we find a frozen human?
Yes, it’s the rest of Khan’s jolly crew from the Botany Bay. Don’t worry none of them wake up to make this film actually interesting. Somehow Khan or Marcus got the crew stuffed into the torpedo tubes (25) and Marcus was going to fire Khans old mates at him instead of just dropping them into the nearest sun (26). At that point Marcus shows up with a super dreadnaught that has everything a warship could possibly need except for locks on the outer doors (27). Much is said about how this is the first Federation warship and how the Enterprise was just an explorer with guns (sorry, but I have to take issue with this. The Enterprise in TOS was always a considered a warship that was used for exploration. 28). Marcus does the typical evil monolog and plans to kill Khan and the rest of the crew. His daughter comes up to stop him and he just transports her onto his ship (what was her plan exactly? How did she not see that coming? 29). They do a space battle but Marcus’s ship is disabled when it is revealed that Scotty was on board the other ship and shut down the warp core (I might buy his ability to hide on board the ship and shut it down, but how did he know what was going on? For all he knew Marcus was fighting an alien horde. Also remember when communicators were for short range communication? Apparently Abrams does not as hand held communicators can now reach from Kronos to Earth. 30. By the way, when they show Kronos it is with the moon blown up. For those of you who aren’t in the know, that moon got blown up in Star Trek 6, 30+ years after the date of this film and IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT TIMELINE THAT JJ ABRAMS DESTROYED WHEN HE REBOOTED THE FRANCHISE! For god’s sake if you are going to do something stick with it. Lazy, lazy, lazy. 31).
Neither ship has weapons capabililty (nothing more exciting than a space battle involving two ships aimless drifting at each other) so Kirk recruits Khan to personally assault Marcus’s ship before they are all killed (the Enterprise has a crew of over 400 people. Doesn’t he have anyone who knows which end of a phaser the pew pew comes out of? 32). They capture the ship and of course Khan betrays them. He extorts his crew out of Spock and starts blowing the hell out of the Enterprise. Naturally Spock send over armed torpedoes and blows his ship up (by the way, much is said to establish that Vulcans cannot lie in order to make this deception a big deal, but that was never a part of any Star Trek until this movie. Spock could lie when it suited his needs, and his wife T’Pring lied her ass off at him).
Now we get to the part that made me want to weep. The core is knocked out of alignment and in a sort of homage to TWOK with a super “fun” twist it is now Kirk who has to go into the radiation room and fix the warp core with precision kicks (literally. Everyone knows you can fix high tech equipment with blunt force, like Fonzie and the jukebox. 33). They do the whole Spock death scene exactly as they did in the good film only without the emotional gravitas or weight. Anyway, Spock now has an emotional freak out (34) and screams Khaaaaan to no one in particular (35). Khan has crashed his ship in San Francisco (did I not mention that the whole fight took place 200K kilometers from Earth? Good thing Earth doesn’t have any kind of detectors or ships around that might have done something. 36) and Spock goes after him (again, no one else on board who can shoot?). They do a foot race that looks a lot like the final fight scene from Revenge of the Sith (with less lava, of course) and he captures him. JJ then pulls a happy ending from the deepest recess of his sweatiest ass and has Khan’s blood return Kirk from the dead (37), effectively removing any possible emotional connection with this film and draining the last of my interest.
I’d like to comment a bit on fake death scene and why it was such a miserable failure. I have often said that that scene in TWOK made me cry like a little girl and to this day tears me up. It was the death of a legendary icon, my childhood idol and best friend, and the effective end of the franchise (sure they kept it going but really the Star Trek I grew up with died there). In this film we get a cheesy reimagining with characters we don’t really give a damn about and an event we all know the studio will never let stand, especially when McCoy was already working on blood with regenerative abilities. It has all the weight of a wet fart and was about as annoying and insulting. Also, when Kirk scream Khaaaaan in the good movie Khan had just left them to die on a rock and Kirk was in communication with him, not bellowing at an empty bulkhead. This scene was forced into the movie with all the subtlety of a gardenhose colonoscopy and was about as painful. The only thing I felt when Kirk died was a weird kind of relief that that scene was over and a slight wonder as to when they would do the blood thing.
Oh, by the way why the need to capture Khan alive? Does Kirk need a full body transfusion? A tiny syringe of blood was enough to revive the Tribble. Couldn’t they mop up Khans blood off the pavement, or drain it from whatever body parts are still lying around after Spock gets done with him? Also aren’t replicators pretty well established in Star Trek and couldn’t they just whip up a batch of it on their own? How about the fact that they have like 72 other frozen super humans with the same blood, including the one guy they pulled out in order to freeze Kirk in the first place? For that matter what motivated to McCoy to inject Khan’s blood into a dead tribble in the first place? Is this some kind of standard Starfleet Medical procedure? “Well, you tested negative for all STD’s and your Dead Tribble Revival rating is through the roof!”? Am I the only one seeing these things? 38, 39, and 40.
The stars.
Special effects are great, but if you are going to a Star Trek film for special effects you are missing the point. One star. Some of the stuff I liked included the underwater jet boots and the look of the Federation Dreadnaught. One star. Uhura and the new girl are very easy on the eyes in a family friendly PG-13 way. One star. For all my bile, it is still a Star Trek movie. One star. Total: four stars.
The black holes.
So 40 plot holes, canon mistakes, or just stupid plot devices and that’s after a tertiary examination. I think that’s worth at least three black holes. Using Star Trek to warm up for his Star Wars movie. One black hole. Chris Pine is still not Kirk. One black hole. The crowbaring in of the death scene and the Khaaan moment in a worthless and painful manner. One black hole. Essentially a very lazy script that only picked the low hanging fruit, while leaving all the good stuff that required a step ladder to rot. Two black holes. Extra character who added nothing. One black hole. It’s weird to say this, but this movie had a strange pacing. Normally 135 minutes of sci fi is easy for me even if it’s not Star Trek, but this one felt like a grind. One black hole. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again; there is a limit to how many near death escapes a character can survive before you stop giving a damn, and this one hit the limit in the first 20 minutes. Every scene was yet another shockingly (yet not really shocking. More like licking a 9 volt battery than getting hit with a tazer) close call. It’s like being given a delicious chocolate sunday and as soon as you are done being fed 23 more in two hours. Eventually you are going to vomit and go into a sugar coma. One black hole.
A grand total of seven black holes. An incredibly disappointing score for me for a Star Trek movie. However, understand that as I love Star Trek so much I hold anything related to it to a higher standard. If you are not a rabid fan and/or just want to be entertained go for it. I think you might get a little bored by the end but no worries. You will feel like you got your monies worth. Date movie? It annoys the crap out of me that I have to say yes as being a Star Trek nerd has for years been a huge deal breaker for me and women, but I think it would work. Bathroom break? Honestly the death scene is the perfect time, and since no one actually dies it has zero weight or merit. Go for it.
Thanks for reading. This is another one I hate myself for doing, but I am in almost all things honest, especially when it comes to things I love being abused by people. For the record this is the longest review I have ever written. Follow me on Twitter NerdKungFu. Feel free to post comments here on my review or this movie. Off topic comments, suggestions, or death threats can be emailed to [email protected]. Talk to you soon.
Dave
Peeples Movie Review
Feeble.
Whenever there is a huge whale of a movie debut like Ironman 3 it tends to scare all the smaller fish out of the proverbial pond, leaving all us hardworking reviewers with next to nothing to feed on except the occasional minnow like Peeples (or, as it should have been called, Meet the Parents with Black People). Odds are on a regular week this one would have slipped my notice entirely but as it is one of the few things I can jump on I guess I am stuck with it (if you think this is stretching wait until you see what I have lined up for tomorrow).
So this movie was kind of lame. I am actually a big fan of Craig Robinson from the Office and hoped this was going to work. However this Little Engine that Could was fueled entirely by mangled cliche’s and a weird new uncanny valley of situations ridiculous enough to be annoying but not ridiculous enough to actually be funny (Little Train image courtesy of the Cheap T Shirts category). I don’t want to jump down too hard on this film mainly because it appears to be the directors first debut and I hate squishing potential. After all, when I first started excreting waste I did it willy nilly and needed to wear a diaper all the time and in the last couple years have almost completely shifted to using a toilet. Life is an evolutionary process and we are all better today than we were yesterday.
Potential aside, the director has written a couple of movies that don’t exactly imply a future Scorsese (one about a roller rink, one about drums) but you never know.
I won’t say this movie was entirely without merit. Like I said I enjoy Craig Robinson and he had his funny moments in this film, as did David Alan Grier and Malcolm Barrett. The entire cast did a decent job with the acting. Dialog wasn’t horrible. The chemistry between Craig and David was actually quite fun up until the last 10 minutes. The problem is the good elements fail to outweigh the bad.
This is one of those special films that had I been wearing a foam dome full of Nøgne Ø Dark Horizon (Norways finest 16% beer) I probably would have been laughing my ass off and enjoyed it a lot. Once you disconnect the higher brain functions your stem is fully capable of forgetting how every joke you are seeing has been done elsewhere ad infinitum. Once again I am cursed with a brain (or so I think. If I am way stupider than I believe myself to be let me thank all of you for not bursting my fantasy bubble).
The story. It can easily be summed up with two questions:
1. Have you seen Meet the Parents?
2. Can you mentally substitute black actors for all the white ones is that movie?
If you can answer yes to both feel free to skip ahead four paragraphs to the stars and black holes. For those of you who cannot it tells the story of Wade Walker (Craig Robinson-the Office, Hot Tub Time Machine, Pineapple Express) and his super hot girlfriend Grace Peeples (Kerry Washington-Django Unchained, Last King of Scotland, Ray) (by the way, we can thank Kevin James for the whole super hot girl/fat loser guy Hollywood relationship dynamic. I still want to transfer to the dimension where that is a reality). She is a successful lawyer and he sings urine songs at children’s parties. She is headed back to her home of Sag Harbor for the annual Moby Dick Day (Sag Harber is apparently the town mentioned several times in the book Moby Dick. As this movie progresses you can expect the dick jokes to reappear when you least expect it like an embarrassing rash. Also, did you know that Herman Melville’s grandfather took part in the Boston Tea Party? History is cool) with her family, whom Wade has yet to meet in spite of the fact that he has been seeing her for over a year and lives with her. Apparently he is so codependant that he can’t handle a weekend without his significant other and after whining about it with his younger brother Chris (Malcolm Barett-the Hurt Locker, Better Off Ted, My Best Friend’s Girl) he decides to do the old drop by.
By the way, if you thought Wade’s urine singing sounded like a lame career, Chris’s job apparently is to pretend to be a doctor and fix broken dolls at a doll hospital. I have a hard time seeing a positive ROI for whoever opened that business in NYC. It was at that moment that I finally nailed down exactly what kind of humor I was going to be subjected to for the next 85 minutes or so. Odds are I could have bunked out at that moment and still written this review with little loss to you, my beloved reader. Damn my integrity.
Anyway, Wade gets up to Sag Harbor. He arrives at the Peeples house only to be sexually assaulted by the family dog (and have his wallet stolen. I guess it was a dog rape/robbery. Not sure who actually finds that funny). He meets Grace’s parents and in particular meets her father Virgil (David Alan Grier-In Living Color, the Woodsman, Stuart Little). He is a federal judge and takes an immediate dislike to Wade. Wade is more welcomed by the rest of her family of cliche’s: her alcoholic drug addicted mother Daphne (S. Epatha Merkerson-Terminator 2 (I thought she looked familiar), Lackawanna Blues, Black Snake Moan), her secretly lesbian sister Gloria (Kali Hawk-Bridesmaids, Get Him To the Greek, Couples Retreat), the sisters “friend” Meg (Kimrie Lewis-Davis-State of Play, the American Dream, Berman & Berman), and her kleptomaniac brother Simon (Tyler James William-Everybody Hates Chris, Let it Shine, Sesame Street).
At that point just go with whatever lame misunderstanding could arise from those circumstances you imagine and odds are it happened. Wade lost his wallet so the father thinks he is a bum. Simon steals something and Wade gets blamed. Gloria gets him accidentally stoned on muchrooms and the father thinks he is a stoner. Everything gets misinterpreted by everyone to make Wade look like a loser (or as much as a loser as a guy who sings pee songs for children can).
The stars:
Like I said, I enjoyed the chemistry between Wade and Virgil. One star. Most of the acting was decent for what the actors were given. One star. The two sisters were both heart breakers (damn that PG-13 rating). One star. Total: three stars.
The black holes:
If cliche’s were an alternative fuel source this movie could have just solved the oil crisis. One black hole. While things were amusing, there was nothing really laugh out loud funny. Most of the humor were that kind of funny you get from political jokes. Intellectually humorous without actually being stimulating. One black hole. Pacing was slow. This film felt a lot longer than 95 minutes. One black hole. Total: three black holes.
A straight zero. Typically this means a move you can leave or take, and I think that an apt description. This film is not really worth the cost of a movie ticket but if you are bored at home one evening and have a ready supply of alcohol you should be able to enjoy it. Date movie? Sure, why not. There is some romance and the last few minutes should leave your date believing that love can overcome any obstacle so go for it. No studly dudes to make you look like a putz. Bathroom break? The list is extensive. I’d say the scene on the beach is probably the least valuable. Anything of interest that happens there turns into a running gag that gets beaten into the ground about 8,000 times.
Meh. Not much of a review. The bland movies are always the most boring to write up. Keep an eye out for something interesting tomorrow. I am going to give into the indy film tank and see if I can either catch a lobster or come out covered in leeches. Follow me on Twitter @Nerdkungfu. If you have comments on this film or my review feel free to post them here. Off topic questions or suggestions can be sent to [email protected]. Have a great day.
Dave
The Great Gatsby Movie Review
Pretty but not great.
The day after I saw this film a friend asked me what I thought and I replied “Kind of pretty but not a lot else” at which point she said “That’s too bad. I love Baz Luhrmann.” This struck me as odd as I had never heard of this guy before seeing about 800,000 The Making of the Great Gatsby shorts Regal Cinima liked to shove onto the screen prior to showing the actual trailers over the last several months. Could it be he was some icon of film making that my low brow taste in movies caused me to miss, like an Austrailian Lars von Trier? A quick look at his filmography assured me that I had not missed much, although it explained why my female friend was a fan of his. Basically he makes great visual chick movies like Moulin Rouge! and Strictly Ballroom. I can honestly say I have never seen any of his other films and am not going to rush out to find them.
This film has fallen victim to it’s own marketing. I have seen the same trailer for it before every movie for the last six months. This translates into a lot of times. The trailer shows all kinds of action, with explosive WWI scenes, a huge sailing boat, guys beating up other guys, Gatsby walking in out of the rain looking like he’s ready to kick 8 kinds of ass, and above all a cool yellow car tearing ass through New York city. The car was there and played it’s part, but for the most part every other really cool exciting scene had little to nothing to do with the actual movie. Most of them were flashbacks or parts of sub plots. I spent most of the movie willing something exciting to happen.
I have never read the Great Gatsby. My high school was in most ways sub par, unless you think having a state championship surf team is remotely significant. I don’t see this as inhibiting my ability to review this film as all movies need to be able to stand on its own run time with no prerequisites. However my best friend is a huge fan of the book and filled me in on a lot of stuff. It’s basically a story about decadence and privileged in the 20’s. The main characters sole motivation for injecting himself into that society was to win over vain, superficial socialite Daisy. She is supposed to be everything one could despise in that society, epitomizing what some see as the class struggle depicted in the book.
The parts of the movie that bugged the hell out of me ironically turned out to be the parts that it looks like Baz Lurhmann opted to change or not bother to portray. Instead of showing Daisy to be a vain golddigger he presents her as a kind, gentle spirit with a load of compassion and depth. In addition to illustrating the danger of directors falling in love with their lead characters it also makes her final decisions and actions in the last 20 minutes so at odds with her character that I kept looking for body snatcher pods in the greenery. The disparity was jarring and off putting. If you spend most of a movie establishing a character you can’t have her pull a U turn without any kind of motivation. There was also a tertiary attempt at showing the difference between the lavish and tasteless decadence of the upper classes and the struggling working class, but it was so glossed over that you could walk away with the feeling that there was no consequence to letting the proletariat eat cake. The narrator, while starting off as a main character himself, turns into the physical manifestation of deus ex machina and ends up having the personality of the background scenery. Gatsby himself is well portrayed by Leonardo di Caprio, but you don’t meet him for the first 40 minutes of the film and most of the time he seems so over the top you have a hard time identifying with him.
Also, ultimately this story is a total bummer. My friend tells me at least that part is true to the book but that doesn’t make it easier to absorb. A sad ending is great when it is well portrayed (if you want to see an amazing sad story watch the Deer Hunter) but at the end of a film that seems to want to have all the depth of a kiddie pool it feels out of place. It’s like Baz suddenly realized his movie was more glitz than content and cranked in a last minute deep ending. The parts don’t all seem to match (yes, I know this is the true ending from the book. I just call them like I see them, and I’m willing to bet the book had a lot more depth throughout).
By the way, is it fair to be truly annoyed that IMDB doesn’t even list F. Scott Fitzgerald as a writer in the main credits? For shame.
Before I get into the story I’d like to mentions something about the visuals. In that making of video I have seen about 100 times Baz talks about wanting to keep the aesthetic of the 20’s. In order to do so he uses extensive CGI and it shows, although not in a good way. Huge swaths of the film look like any of the daylight scenes of Coruscant from Star Wars Episode II or III. It just looks cartoonish and unreal. A certain amount of unreality is acceptable in science fiction but in a period piece like this one it just feels wrong. Also the effort put in to justify shooting this in 3D was considerable and for the most part wasted. I live for the day Hollywood realizes that 3D is a massive waste of time and money.
The story. Nick Carraway (Tobey McGuire-Spider Man and not a whole lot else. Spider-man image courtesy of the Marvel Comic T Shirt category) starts off in a mental institution recounting the events that lead him here (this, by the way, is another plot device that Baz created that does not exist in the book and it really bugged. Don’t mess with the classics IMO). This thin premise allows him to do a voice over narration detailing his life in West Egg, a Long Island community. He has a cottage next to the biggest mansion in the world or so. He connects with his old Yale classmate Tom Buchannon (Joel Edgerton-Warrior, the Thing, Revenge of the Sith), to whom he seems to have no loyalty. Tom is married to Nicks cousin Daisy (Carey Mulligan-Drive, an Education, Pride and Prejudice), a hauntingly beautiful socialite. They all have tea together with Daisy’s freakishly tall friend Jordan Baker (Elizabeth Debicki-A Few Best Men) where Nick is told about Gatsby, a mysterious millionaire who throws lavish parties in the very mansion Nick lives next to.
Nick eventually meets Gatsby (Leonardo di Caprio-Inception, Titanic, Shutter Island), who recruits him into helping set up a meeting between Daisy and he. He knew Daisy before the war and has been enamored of him ever since but for some mysterious reason she married Tom. Meanwhile Tom is having an affair with Myrtle (Isla Fisher-Rango, Rise of the Guardians, Home and Away), the wife of lower class auto mechanic George (Jason Clarke-Zero Dark Thirty, Lawless, Death Race). Gatsby finally gets his meeting with Daisy, and starts to woo her. At that point the story is supposed to be about Daisy’s conflict between her rich husband and rich boyfriend, but honestly it just seemed like she was all one way and then jumped ship with no thought whatsoever.
The stars.
I have to give Baz credit for ambition, and for attempting to tell a story that does not fit in the normal Hollywood demographic. Two stars. Visually stunning at parts, and the attention to detail and costuming was amazing. One star. Leonardo did his usual great job. When exactly did I become a fan of his? I used to hate the guy. One star. Joel Edgerton also did a very fine job. One star. Aside from the cartoon like CGI the camera work and editing were impressive, with a lot of cool shots that go beyond the pale. One star. The movie ran a massive 143 minutes but managed to not feel like it, so great editing and pacing. One star. Carey Mulligan has the face that should inspire great paintings and sculptures, and Elizabeth Debicki is pretty damned hot as well. One star. Total: eight stars.
The black holes.
The movie really failed to latch on to any of the available themes from the book, and left me wondering “Why did all that happen exactly?”. One black hole. The insane asylum gag was hackneyed and cliche. For that matter I had a hard time taking anything Tobey McGuire did seriously. One black hole. The Daisy character was grossly underdeveloped, and what was presented of her was at odds with the character she was supposed to play. She bounced back and forth like a Ping Pong ball and had about as much volition. One black hole. There were a lot of sub plots that I’m sure are huge in the book but in here they needed to be explored a little more. Also a general lack of character motivation. One black hole. I have said before I rarely pay attention to a sound track and it has to be really bad or really good for me to even notice, and in this case it was really bad. A sound track should help you with the immersion, reinforcing the visuals and helping to set the tone. Having a film set in the 20’s but have songs by Jay-Z and Beyonce is completely wrong. It’s like watching Col. Kurtz get killed at the end of Apocalypse Now and have Barbie Girl by Aqua playing in the background (except that might have some LOL points that this film lacks). One black hole. Total: five black holes.
A grand total of three stars. Meh. Worth seeing if you are a huge Leonardo fan or just like watching rich people party. If you do want to see it be sure to do so on a big screen as the visual are nice. Date movie? Absolutely, 100% yes. The costumes, period, and romance will definitely hold your date’s interest, and if she has ever considered not going out with you because you are not rich this film will guilt the hell out of her. As an illustration of how women can be painfully shallow and bring about the destruction of otherwise decent film this film should be required viewing for all single women (not that I’m bitter). Bathroom break? At 143 minutes you are going to need something. Honestly any of the party scenes are pretty repetitive and one could be missed easily, but they are all in the first half of the film. The actual romance scenes between Gatsby and Daisy don’t do a whole lot so go then (unless you are on a date. If so hold it and use that chance to hold her hand or something).
Thanks for reading. I plan to see Peeples tonight. It looks awful but I have been enjoying a lot of decent films lately so eventually I guess I have to pay the piper. Follow me on Twitter @Nerdkungfu. If you have comments on this film or my review please post them here. Any off topic questions or suggestions can be emailed to [email protected]. Talk to you soon.
Dave