Maleficent Review
Kind of OK.
The day will come when I finally learn to not get excited by good trailers but that day is not today. (I also like to tell myself that the day will come where I win the lottery, get Congress to pass my mandatory death penalty for Mimes and Clowns law, complete my unstoppable world conquering army of mutant atomic super men, and get a girl to go on more dates than I have fingers on one hand but that day is also not today.) I have been seeing Maleficent trailers for months and each time I get more and more excited. Angelina Jolie as an evil fairy with horns and wings? A clever re-imaging of a classic fairy tail? A battle between what we in the Warhammer world we would call the Wood Elf Forest Spirits and the Bretonians? Amazing special effects and CGI? How can this be anything less than amazing?
Then I see the movie. I’m not going to disparage it. It’s not bad. It’s just not great. It’s more or less just…there. It really tends towards the standard design-by-committee take no chances pap that every other main stream movie is, counting on visuals and star appeal to make up for the lack of creativity and quality writing. Angelina Jolie is pretty amazing and more or less carries the whole movie on her sexy shoulders but her character is so watered down that everything she does leaks impact from every seam. The CGI is as amazing as a $200,000,000 budget will get you (in case you were wondering, $200,000,000 is enough to send 307,692 children to school in Africa. I’m just saying) and there is not a hint of bad acting. It’s just clear that this film was paralyzed into mediocrity by a fear of doing anything outside of the formula.
In truth I am pretty disappointed by Hollywood’s inability to do the whole fairy tale redo thing and have it do more than just suck. I really want to see some cool stories come from the classic Brothers Grim but instead we are fed dross such as Hansel & Gretel, Snow White and the Huntsman, Jack the Giant Slayer, and Mirror Mirror. They didn’t all totally suck (well, Hansel & Gretel did, and Jack the Giant Slayer will put you to sleep in the veterinary sense. Image courtesy of the Movie T Shirt category) but every time they come out all I see is more wasted potential. It’s like the goal is to come out with the blandest porridge possible, fulfilling all the minimum nutritional requirements but not much more. Pretty much the gruel they ate in the Matrix. I’d put this movie at the top of that list of films but not by more than a nose.
Muppets Most Wanted Review
I would want to see it even if it weren’t my job.
As I typed that title I realized that really is the measure of a fun movie for me. I see a lot of films and while I can enjoy and appreciate a great film I wouldn’t otherwise choose to go see (Dallas Buyers Club, for example) the part where my job gets fun is when there is a movie that I would want to see and it turns out to meet or exceed my expectations.
On the other hand the films that feel my bile and contempt the most are the ones where I really wanted to see it and it sucks. This could probably describe the entire Transformers series (or Green Lantern. Or Star Trek. Actually the list could go one quite a while) but the other part about seeing a lot of movies is you see a lot of trailers too so I tend to have an expectation that is almost inevitably exceeded or failed to meet.
The point is as a fan of the Muppets TV show and the more recent Muppets movie I was really looking forward to seeing this one and am very happy to report that it met or exceeded my expectations. In many ways it improved dramatically on the first one in ways that I specifically had issues with, leading me to believe that the writers and director of this film are among my 18 regular readers (either that or I am not the observational genius I like to believe I am and other people more involved in the film industry had the same criticisms I had. No way that could be possible however).
The main issue I had with the last film that they more or less eliminated in this one was too many humans, not enough Muppets. In the last film something like 80% of the screen time was filled with Jason Segals big meaty face and his romance story with Amy Adams (her face is much more appealing but she was definitely not dressed as she was in American Hustle, if you catch my drift). If I want to see Jason Segal acting like a wimpy douche I will watch reruns of How I Met Your Mother, thank you. I don’t watch porn for the drama and I don’t watch Transformers movies to see Shia Laeouf whine and bumble his way through life with the hottest girlfriends ever. I don’t watch the Muppets for the humans and the last movie had way toooooo much of them. This one solves the problem nicely by having the only recurring humans be the bad guy (that pronounced Bad-gee. It’s French) and the enormously talented Tina Fey, both in supporting roles. The rest of the humans were really good for little cameos and bits but otherwise kept to a minimum.
The other elephant in the room from the last movie that they shrank down to mouse sized and stuck in a terrarium was Walter. In the last film whatever scene wasn’t up to it’s neck in Jason Segal was smeared with the least appealing Muppet character ever created. Sorry but I hated Walter. I would seriously rather see the entire cast of the Garbage Pail Kids live action movie in this film than have him in even one scene. He is boring looking and has the personality of a Muppet without a hand in its ass. In this film he does a few lines mostly as support and otherwise spends his time under a rock (I assume). Well done. Stick with the Muppets created by Jim Henson jackasses. They don’t need a creative re-imagining thank you.
On the other hand this film more or less ignored all the beloved supporting characters and focused almost entirely on Kermit and Piggy. This was a mistake in that to be honest the main three Muppets (these two and Fozzie) were always the least interesting or appealing characters. This movie made Kermit much more interesting by mixing him up with Constantine, the worlds most dangerous frog. In other words when Kermit has been replaced by a Russian criminal mastermind he gets funny and interesting. However, one minute of Gonzo the Great is worth 15 minutes of Kermit, 45 minutes of Piggy, and 10,243,534,834 minutes of Fozzie Bear. Each of them showed up (including a great scene for the Swedish Chef early on) but once they made their token appearance they slunk back into the background and more or less faded out (actually Dr. Bunsen Honeydew and Beeker had a great part towards the end and I love the latest invention to come out of Muppet Labs).
For the record the actual world’s most dangers frog, Phyllobates terribilis AKA the South American poison dart frog, secrets a skin poison that is 400 times more deadly than cobra venom. It is considered the most dangerous animal in the world and is a bright orange with black spots. People who vacation in the Amazon rain forests are idiots.
The story. The film starts at the wrap up of the last film (sans Jason and Amy). The Muppets are told they got picked up for a sequel and decide to do a world tour. They meet up with world tour manager Dominic Badguy (Pronounced Bad-gee. It’s French. Ricky Gervais-the Invention of Lying, Cemetery Junction) who, with a little input from Walter, convinces them to go on a world tour. Meanwhile Constantine, the worlds most dangerous frog escapes from a Russian Gulag.
The Muppets end up in Berlin where Dominic convinces Kermit to take a walk. Constantine glues a mole on his face and Kermit gets arrested as Constantine puts makeup on his and takes over his life with the Muppets. They do their show while Dominic and Constantine break into the museum next door and steal a painting. They take the Muppets from city to city robbing something in each one. Each robbery gets them closer to their goal: the crown jewels of England.
Meanwhile Sam Eagle shows up to investigate and hooks up with Interpol agent Jean Pierre Napoleon (Ty Burrell-Mr. Peabody and Sherman, Goats, the Skeleton Twins). They have a hilarious team up with a lot of jokes at the fun of the European work ethic.
Kermit lands in the Russian Gulag under the thumb of dragon queen Nadya (Tina Fey-Admission, 30 Rock, Megamind) and mixed in with some great cameos (including the great Danny Trejo, who later has one of the best jokes of the movie). They figure out quickly that he is not Constantine. She later recruits Kermit to produce and star in the prison musical.
Eventually Animal (who knew Constantine was not Kermit from the beginning), Fozzie, and Walter track Kermit down and use the prison musical as a cover for a mass escape. They get to England to try to prevent Constantine from marrying Piggy and stealing the jewels.
The stars:
Muppets. One star. Three of my favorite Muppets had big parts; Beeker, Animal, and Dr. Honeydew. One star. Really, really funny jokes, especially the Danny Trejo one (actually he had two great jokes now that I think about it). Two stars. Less humans, and the humans that were in it enhanced the Muppets rather than distracted you away from them. One star. Tina Fey was especially good (and really good looking. Ending 30 Rock was a great thing for her. Tina if you have ever had a fantasy of dating one of your fans email me). One star. Constantine was freaking brilliant, and the scenes where he is pretending to be Kermit were hilarious. One star. The Sam the Eagle sub plot was also great and helped punctuate the scene shifts from the Muppets on tour to Kermit in prison. An excellent choice in my opinion. One star. It’s rare that I give a star for something that is not in a film, but less Walter was a great move. One star. The musical numbers were all super fun. One star. Some awesome celebrity cameos. The Celine Dion ones were especially brilliant. One star. In general a great time. Two stars. Total: 13 stars.
The black holes:
The lack of time for the supporting characters bummed me out. I really wanted to see more Gonzo, or Lew Zealand and his Boomerang Fish. They are all just more interesting. One black hole. While most of the celebrity cameos were fun, funny, and organic the Usher one felt as unnatural, awkward and unnecessary as skin suit made of steel wool and poison ivy. Normally I wouldn’t black hole for something this minor but at the time it really threw me out of the movie. One black hole. Total: two black holes.
Eleven stars. What a great score. Of course as a fan of the Muppets from my childhood you have to consider the fact that I am very nostalgic but still really fun time. Should you see it? If fun is something you enjoy then yes. If you have no sense of humor or spend all your time worried about conspiracies and politics probably not. Date movie? Hell yes! If she doesn’t enjoy this film and you for bringing her to it odds are she has already been replaced by a Pod Person. Don’t accept her invitation for a walk through her garden. Bathroom break? Hold it in. Every scene is worth watching. If I had to pick one scene to miss I’d say the solo song with Miss Piggy towards the end is the least critical, but if you miss it you will miss a really funny cameo too. Run and don’t wash (eww).
Thanks for reading. To celebrate seeing this Muppets film I am going to see another great Jim Henson film, Labyrinth, tonight at the Castro Theater in San Francisco. It’s going to be classically epic (Labyrinth image comes from my movie t shirt category). Feel free to post here if you have comments on this film or my review. Off topic questions or suggestions can be emailed to [email protected]. Have a great weekend. Talk to you soon.
Dave
Pompeii Review
In a bizarre twist of fate I didn’t hate it.
Years ago I read a sci fi novel that had a lot of commentary about modern American society. I really can’t remember the name or author but one of the things he talked about was different kinds of porn. I don’t just mean jerk off material but like someone who enjoyed looking at pictures of food would be looking at food porn, or cars auto porn. I don’t really remember if he was trying to say something about how we fixate on things or if he was just trying to change the meaning of the term porn, but one of the categories one of his characters was into was disaster porn.
That’s pretty much what Pompeii is. Disaster porn. If watching cities get buried under flying balls of liquid magma and flooded by tidal waves flips your switch then you have found your next favorite film. I’m not even saying that’s a bad thing. I’ve looked at way too much regular porn in my life to comment on someone enjoying visuals of something that gets them off (unless you enjoyed 2012, in which case you are a total freak). I’m just saying that this movie will please any disasterphile out there.
I myself am not adverse to watching Godzilla wreak havoc through Tokyo. This film is pretty much Sparticus and 300 meets Deep Impact so it makes sense that I would find it fun. In truth I am trying to figure out why I expected it to suck so much more than it did. Maybe I am still feeling the residual pain of the Legend of Hercules and any film involving bare chested guys with swords is going to have to overcome that hurdle. Perhaps I was expecting another 2012 or Armageddon. I don’t know. I entered the theater expecting to put another notch on my bedpost of movie hate.
I suppose one reason I expected suckitude is the fact that it was directed by Paul Anderson, who kind of specializes in disaster movies if you know what I mean. Anyone else remember Death Race or the Three Musketeers? I do, in the same way that an alien abduction victim remembers the sound of the anal probulator powering up. However the thing I always forget is that as bad as his movies can be they are usually in some dumb way fun to watch. Sure the Resident Evil films are to entertainment what cock fighting is to animal kindness but you can’t help but be entertained by watching a hot chick in a skin tight leather outfit leap, flip, stab, shoot, kick, and punch her way through hundreds of zombies.
I have to admit I was pleased by how they treated the story the way a girl should treat her skirt: long enough to cover the subject but short enough to keep in interesting (my 60 year old female 10th grade English teacher gave me that line. There are some days when I really miss the 80’s). Paul Anderson must have taken a film class or something as there was nothing ridiculous about the action, there was no sign of technology that should not exist (16th century monofiliment line, etc), and the story served as a very adequate platform upon which to serve up exploding volcanoes and gladiator fight scenes (“Do you like gladiator movies?” What movie is that from gentle reader?). It is actually quite different from almost all of his other movies and since it is one of his best I think Mr. Anderson might take a lesson home from that.
All that is not to say that it is a brilliant film worthy of your adulation and fandom. It’s no Usual Suspects. It’s no 300. It’s no Watchman. It’s not great or even especially good. It’s just that it sucks a lot less than most films these days and that puts it on the Worthy to Watch pedestal.
By the way, this film was PG-13 and the stench of that hung about in the theater like I was watching the movie with the 50 finalists of the World Championship Bean Eating Contest, but for some reason it didn’t grind on me that much. I guess there is a way to do PG-13 that doesn’t feel like your mom just used too much baby powder on your diaper.
The story is pretty basic and my blogs have been pretty long lately so I’ll speed through it. Roman Senator Corvus (Kiefer Sutherland-Dark City, 24, L.A. Confidential) with his lieutenant Bellator (Currie Graham-Stargate the Ark of Truth, Hitchcock, Assault on Precinct 13) are tearing ass through a Celtic tribe and Corvus orders them all killed. Young Milo manages to hide and escape only to be captured and sold into slavery. 15 years later Milo (Kit Harrington-Silent Hill: Revelation 3d, Game of Thrones, Greenland Time) is an accomplished gladiator who regularly beats multiple opponents (Gladiator helmet image courtesy of the Movie T Shirt category). He is sent to Pompeii join their games.
On the way a coach carrying the beautiful Cassia (Emily Browning-Sucker Punch, Ghost Ship, the Host) runs into a pot hole and one of the horses is injured. Milo helps the horse feel better before putting it down and he and Cassia fall in love at first sight. She gets back to Pompeii and is reunited with her father Severus (Jared Harris-Natural Born Killers, Sherlock Holmes A Game of Shadows, Lincoln) and mother Aurelia (Carrie-Anne Moss-The Matrix, Disturbia, Momento). Also along with her is my future wife Ariadne (Jessica Lucas-That Awkward Moment, Evil Dead, Cloverfield). She really didn’t do much in this film but I want to mention her because once we are married I plan to live off her acting jobs and therefore need to promote her at all times. Seriously, even with half her face cut off in Evil Dead I would marry her. Her beauty is almost enough for me to forgive her for being in That Awkward Moment (almost).
Anyway, Milo gets thrown into the pits and meets reigning champ Atticus (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje-The Bourne Identiy, G.I. Joe the Rise of Cobra, the Mummy Returns). Atticus needs only win one more fight and gain his freedom. Meanwhile Severus is cooking up some deal to rebuild Pompeii and his number one investor turns out to be Corvus. Corvus met Cassia in Rome and is using his business deals to blackmail her into marrying him.
Honestly there’s not much more than that. Cassia loves Milo. Corvus arranges for Milo to get killed in the arena but Milo survives. The volcano blows up and at that point it’s a documentary on how many ways there are to die in a natural disaster, plus a chariot race. The end.
The stars.
The simple plot really worked for this premise. One star. I was afraid the lead up to the volcano was going to drag but there was enough gladiator action to keep things interesting. Actually pacing was dead on point. One star. I honestly don’t know how good an actor Kit is, but he can pull off surly loner and that is pretty much what this role needed. Everyone else nailed it, and of course I am a huge Kiefer Sutherland fan. One star. The visuals were pretty stunning. Even before the volcano blew up they were great, and once it went off Ponpeii was transformed into the 87th level of Hell (reserved for people who insist on using the word “hella”). Excellent CGI and actual effects. One star. The action was at the same time believable and exciting. One star. Every scene with Jessica Lucas on the screen was like mana from Heaven. God she is gorgeous. One star. Paul Anderson took couple serious risks with his plot that diverged from the standard Hollywood fare. I don’t know how that will be received at the box office and will not spoil them but I appreciate the artistic integrity. One star. Total: seven stars.
The black holes.
This film could be said to borrow heavily from a bunch of other films but the term you really want to use is “rip off”. Very derivative. One black hole. PG-13. A little gore and/or nudity would have greatly enhanced the experience. One black hole. Total: two black holes.
So five stars. Not bad. For me that is at the low end of good. I would call this film very entertaining. Worth seeing? Given the dearth of quality in the first part of this year I would say absolutely, assuming you have already seen the Lego Movie (Lego Pompeii? The whole world might explode from too much awesomeness). This is one of those very rare occasions where I will say that 3D might enhance your viewing experience. Big screen the crap out of it. Date movie? Sure. There is enough of a love story to keep her into it and while there are tons of half naked guys running around most of them look like hamburger so you should do OK in the comparison department. Bathroom break? From the moment the final gladiator battle starts until the end of the film there isn’t a scene that doesn’t warrant your attention. There are a few minutes between when Bellator orders the Arena master to make sure Milo dies and that fight that could be missed, but honestly either hurry or hold it in. The whole film is only 98 minutes.
Thanks for reading. I am going to see something so horrible tonight that I don’t even want to type the name as it already is giving me a headache (not to mention causing the worst song of 1981 to play continuously in my head. I’m sure you can figure out which movie I’m planning to see). Look for that review tomorrow. Follow me on Twitter if you want to keep up on my reviews and my ongoing Star Trek discussion. Post comments here if you saw this movie and either agree or disagree with me. Off topic questions or suggestions can be emailed to [email protected] (<–Jessica Lucas I hope you are still reading this). Thanks again and have a great night.
Dave
Robocop Review
It might be “a” Robocop movie but it’s not “my” Robocop movie.
OK, this film wasn’t the Hoovermatic suckfest I expected it to be. It was well executed, had a story, the action was fun and exciting, and you managed to sort of care about the main character. These are good things. The problem is twofold; first off, it really isn’t any better than the first Robocop and in many ways was just not as good and secondly the political message was forced down our throat with all the subtlety of an appendectomy performed with a Sawsall.
The original Robocop was kind of brilliant for 1987. It had wit, sarcasm, and poked fun at almost all of American culture in a way that made us laugh. Robocop moved and acted as we would expect an all steel man to move; slow and clunky but with the inevitable force of a molasses tsunami. He was nigh indestructible (as long as no one thought of the brilliant plan I like to call “Shoot him in the mouth”), had a very cool gun that was holstered in his thigh, and was effectively a machine that we got to know as a person, not the other way around. He also had some brilliant super polite dialog as he was kicking ass. My favorite Robocop line will always be “Come quietly or there will be…trouble.” Little things like when telling Dick Jones what crime he is being arrested for the penal code appears on Robocop’s monitor. For the level of special effects they had (i.e. no CGI) the movie was amazing.
Much less so here. Instead of being an unlucky cop transferred into the worst precinct in Detroit and getting killed due to lack of police resources he is now a veteran detective who gets blown up by a bad guy in a dopey conspiracy. Instead of being a corpse shanghaied into OCP’s clutches he wakes up as Robocop after his wife signed him over and he has full access to his life before. Much of Robocops trials in regaining his humanity are lost here. Now he moves and jumps like Spider Man because…well why would we want to watch a movie about a walking tank when we can show the world how talented our CGI department is?
Even the environment is lessened. In the first film it seems like OCP is a massive consumer conglomerate running most of America. There are hilarious commercials for bizarre products, the implication that they effectively run the military, and the grim idea that all of American morals and culture have fallen to the wayside (“I’d buy that for a dollar!”).
Now it’s just another company (called OmniCorp. The name change really puzzles me. Were they actively trying to be less cool that the first movie? They referenced Omni Consumer Products at the end of the film but too little too late IMO) trying to sell products. There is some bizarre conspiracy involving changing the perception of Americans with regards to the use of drones, and nothing says excitement like a movie about a marketing campaign. There was none of the cool flair behind the evil powers pulling the strings.
Then there’s the blatant political agenda. It’s clear that when the studio opted to remake Robocop they spared no expense and hired the best guy for the job: some dude no one ever heard of. Jose Padilha is a Brazilian director known for such classics as Elite Squad and Elite Squad: the Enemy Within so it’s obvious why Sony fought so hard to bring him into the project. What they didn’t know was that Jose seems to have an engorged erection about one thing and that’s the evils of drones. He couldn’t have forced his message onto the audience harder if he had burned the words “Drones Suck” into our retinas with lasers and then spent the entire movie poking us all in the side and saying things like “Do you see what I mean about drones? Do you get the message? What do you think about drones? Let’s watch ten minutes of my movie with my laser message superimposed over every scene and then you can tell me what you think about drones again. Have you ever thought about what would happen if a drone accidentally killed you or some children? Did I mention that drones are bad?”
The sad part is honestly I don’t think anyone in America gives a crap about drones. Sure, it’s being debated but no one really thinks the military is going to stop using them. No one has yet suggested that we replace cops with robots even if that were possible. It’s like if I wanted to argue with you about the evils of humans marrying dolphins. Sure, I suppose it’s possible and definitely wrong, but is it really worth hinging your whole movie on? Furthermore, fans of Robocop tend to be fans of Science Fiction and honestly I believe most of us think anything remotely robotic is pretty cool.
As an aside they also hired two writers who have written absolutely nothing of note, unless Starship Troopers and every dumb Robocop made-for-TV project ever count (I actually think Starship Troopers was a crap movie. Where the hell were the power suits?). $120 million budget and one of the writers has this movie listed as his only credit. Sigh.
Finally there is the gigantic elephant in the room: PG-13. I felt my first real qualm about this film when I was watching a trailer and they said in a loud, imposing voice like a missive from God “50,000 volt stun gun!”. Was that supposed to be a selling point for this film? The first film was a masterpiece of making future Detroit into the dystopia all of America knows it is headed to: drugs, guns, shooting people, hookers, blowing people up, more guns, more drugs, more shooting people, and a guy being dissolved alive in a giant vat of toxic waste. The final fight scene where Clarance is beating Robocop to death with a steel bar after shooting his female cop partner in the chest is everything this movie is supposed to be about. I will give the director credit in that he fought hard for an R rating but the studio forced the PG-13 after he went grossly over budget. I will say it was as close to an R rating as I have seen a PG-13 film go, but after a while the cleanliness of every scene and the safe, non-threatening way everything dies really sucks the fun out of the action.
The story. In spite of massive support from the O’Reilly show (I’m sorry, Novak Report) starring Pat Novak (Samuel L Jackson-Pulp Fiction, the Incredibles, Django Unchained) OmniCorp (just typing that bugs me) can’t seem to find the support to put drone cops on the street in USA. CEO Raymond Kellers (Michael Keaton-Batman, Speechless, Multiplicity) needs find a way to sway popular opinion in his direction and comes up with the idea of half robot, half cop. Meanwhile Detective Alex Murphy (Joel Kinnaman-the Killing, Safe House, Easy Money) is on the trail of gun runner Anton Vallon (Patrick Garrow-Childstar, 16 Blocks, Blindness). He and his partner Jack Lewis (Michael K. Williams-the Road, Snitch, Gone Baby Gone) fail to make the bust and suspect Anton has police help. Anton opts to kill Alex and blows him up in front of his wife and kid (Abbie Cornish-Sucker Punch, Limitless, Bright Star and John Paul Ruttan-This Means War, the Two Mr. Kissels, Defendor (<–awesome movie BTW)).
So Raymond convinces Clara to sign over Alex and with the help of Dr. Dennett Norton (Gary Oldman-the Fifth Element, the Professional, Lawless) plug Alex into Robocop. He freaks out upon waking (for whatever reason he hates the idea of being made super strong, fast, and nearly indestructible. No pleasing some people). He opts to play ball but goes through an extensive testing and evaluation period. The guy who programed the drones Rick Mattox (Jackie Earle Haley-Shutter Island, Watchmen, Lincoln) hates Robocop and wants him to fail. In order to get him to pass Norton reprograms Alex, effectively taking away his free will.
Alex goes back to Detroit and is reunited with his family. The next morning in order to have him not have his emotions cause the his computer malfunction (?) Nortan has to crank him into super computer guy. He goes out and starts arresting people. Eventually he is reminded of his humanity and opts to solve his own attempted murder. Naturally he is betrayed by OmniCorp and has to fight to save his life. Things get blown up, people get shot, and we are all reminded how evil drones are.
The stars.
The CGI was pretty cool actually. Lots of drones, lots of action. One star. Our old friend the ED-209 makes a welcome and extended appearance without being tweaked too much (ED-209 image courtesy of the Movie T Shirt category). They did lame it up a little by calling the humanoid robots ED-208, like OmniCorp designed a man shaped drone and then the very next robot in the series was a giant preying mantis looking thing but whatever. One star. I have to say I love the cast. I like Michael Keaton a lot and thought Joel Kinneman was pretty good. Samuel Jackson is a welcome sight in any movie where he does not play a Jedi. One star. Story wasn’t horrible. Not as cool as the first one but still decent. One star. While not as good, cool, or well written as the first one it was at least decent. I hesitate to call it a fitting tribute but at least it didn’t insult the original. One star. The fight scene at towards the end between Robocop and a bunch of ED-209s was particularly entertaining. One star. In general fun and entertaining in a bland, safe way. Two stars. Total: eight stars.
The black holes.
There are two gigantic flies in this otherwise blandly inoffensive soup and that is PG-13 rating and the “Drones is bad” political message. I can’t decide which one bugged me more (haw!). Two stars. Is it fair to compare this film to the original? Damn straight it is, and in comparison this film is not as fun, funny, interesting, or timeless by a long shot. One black hole. While the story didn’t suck if you really look into it there are a lot of weaknesses, like how does a corrupt cop think stealing guns from an evidence locker and selling them on the street is even remotely a good idea? How about you drop this PG-13 nonsense and go back to drugs, the real issue that makes sense to we the audience. One black hole. The having Alex start off human instead of being a bad ass robot really robbed his redemption of oomph. Instead of clawing back to being human he just sort of went into a walking coma for a while. One black hole. Total: six black holes.
A total of two stars. Meh. If there were no 1987 Robocop and this movie came out I would probably have enjoyed it more. It still was kind of bland. If for some idiotic reason you never saw the original odds are you suck but would probably enjoy this one quite well. For fans of the original I think you need to see it but just remember that it is not your Robocop. I’d say it’s worth watching. Date movie? Probably not. More of a dudes film. Bathroom break? Most of the meetings between Raymond and his marketing staff are pretty disposable. Honestly any scene that doesn’t have Robocop in it could be missed with impunity.
Thanks for reading. Looks like Hell Week is starting for me, as I have nothing but Winters Tale, Endless Love, and About Last Night to watch. Each of them looks like a different slice of the pain pie for a macho dude such as myself. I hope you readers are grateful for the sacrifices I make for you (especially any hot single female ones, if you know what I mean). I’m in Las Vegas at a trade show for a most of this week but will try to sneak away and catch a flick. I’ll see Winters Tale tonight. I hope it doesn’t cause my penis to fall off. Look for that review tomorrow. Follow me on Twitter @Nerdkungfu. Comments about this film and my review are welcome and can be left here. Off topic questions or suggestions can be emailed to [email protected]. Talk to you soon.
Dave
The Wolf of Wall Street Review
Proof positive that there can be too much of a good thing.
Honestly I was going to skip this one but from what I have hear and read needed to see it to maintain my credibility as a reviewer (haw!). Based on the trailers alone it looked to have three things in the top 1/3rd of the Wikipedia sized list of my personal pet peeves: disgusting and ostentatious displays of wealth, guys who get rich by doing no real work, and bad people who fail to get their what they deserve. But imagine my surprise when the thing that bugged me the most was that this opus went three freaking hours!
Don’t get me wrong. This movie is an excellent candidate for my best movie of the year. Martin Scorsese is a true genius and each scene lovingly crafted with flair and edge. Leonardo Di Caprio hasn’t been better IMO and is making up for ground lost on The Great Gatsby. It’s just that once we have established that all of the characters are degenerate, self indulgent, drug addicted scumbags do we really need to see that point reinforced 400 times? Trust me, if you have seen one cocaine and hooker party you have pretty much seen them all. It’s not like the next orgy scene was going to reveal another facet of Leonardo’s character that until then had gone unremarked. I have a deep love of pumpkin pie but if I had to eat it continuously for 180 minutes my enjoyment of the experience might pale a little.
Cocaine Fiends image comes courtesy of the Movie T Shirt category.
Plus all the other things I expected to bug me about this film did indeed bug me like a peanut butter and cockroach sandwich. Di Caprio’s character spends money like water and talks about all the poor people (like me) who don’t have moral flexibility it takes to rip people off like we are some kind of idiots. He and his friends get rich by building nothing, doing nothing, and taking drugs and sleazy sex on a daily basis. There is a comeuppance of sorts, but it is so flaccid and uneventful in terms of a life lesson that it might not have even been included.
Scorsese has a love of the criminal lifestyle that translates into no real repercussions for any of his criminal characters. Henry Hill might bitch about being an ordinary schnook, but at least he wasn’t rotting in prison. This movie is extremely similar to Goodfellas, but that is more of an endorsement than a criticism. I love that movies. Scorsese also seems to have some kind of bromance or appreciation of Leonardo Di Caprio. Shutter Island, the Aviator, the Departed, Gangs of New York; if Leonardo didn’t knock it out of the park every time I would say seeing him in a Scorsese film is getting tired. Fortunately he did indeed kill it this time.
SPOILER ALERT In the end the thing that is so off putting for me is the whole moral ambiguity. Leonardo has described this film as “a documentary of a scumbag” and indeed it is. However, it really fails to point out any potential issues with living the scumbag lifestyle. If you are hoping to raise your children to be good people and not do drugs, con money out of people, cheat on their spouses, hire prostitutes on a regular basis, hit women, drive while under the influence, abduct their children, bribe public officials, rat out on their friends, pay cops to beat people up, and encourage everyone else around them to do the same don’t let them see this film. All this behavior would be acceptable in a movie character who pays for his sins but by the end of the film he does three years in Club Fed and gets out still rich and getting richer teaching other people how to be scumbags. Meanwhile the honest hard working FBI agent he mocked about riding home on a stinking subway is shown riding home on a stinking subway. The injustice irks me.
The story is of real life hustler Jordan Belfort (Leonardo Di Caprio-Titanic, Inception, Shutter Island) as he climbs up from being a lower class child through the trenches of Wall Street to become a massive millionaire and douchebag. The film is told in a very Goodfellas style with Jordan breaking in periodically with an expository monolog rather than action or dialog to run the story along (for the record, frequent readers will recall me bitching about monologs in films in the past. However it works extremely well in this film. Scorsese uses it as a tool, not a lazy replacement for some writing or filming). He gets on board with a big company but on his first day as a licensed broker the stock market falls apart and he is laid off. He hires on with a small Long Island firm that specializes in penny stock and shortly realizes that the commissions for penny stocks is tremendously higher than Blue Chips (look at me talking like I know what the hell a stock even is).
He meets Donny Azoff (Jonah Hill-21 Jump Street, Moneyball, This is the End), a local nebbish and hires him to form his own firm in an old auto mechanics garage. He hires a bunch of his old cronies to work with him (Jon Favreau-Iron Man, Swingers, Cowboys and Aliens)(Jon Bernthal-the Walking Dead, Snitch, The Ghost)(P.J.Byrne-Evan Almighty, Horrible Bosses, Final Destination 5)(Kenneth Choi-Red Dawn, the Terminal, Walk the Talk). He trains them to be high pressure sales people and they start pulling in big bucks.
At that part the fun starts up and goes to extremes that would offend Caligula. The next hour and a half is like watching Animal House with more money and less behavior governors. Meanwhile Belforts company catches the eye of easily fooled SEC officials and a not so easy to fool FBI agent Agent Denham (Kyle Chandler-Argo, Friday Night Lights, Zero Dark Thirty). He has a meeting with Belfort where Belfort proves what a top notch ass he is.
At that point the film more or less becomes a funnier Leaving Las Vegas. Belfort does every stupid move possible to wreck his life. SPOILER ALERT His wife Naomi (and my dream wife. She has the looks that could launch 1,000 very horny ships. Margot Robbie-Pan Am, About Time, Neighbors) ends up leaving him. He wrecks his car and then turns around and rats out the very friends who stood by him and actively tried to help him. In the end he does some very soft, short time and becomes a minor celebrity.
The stars.
I know I say a lot of movies have good acting, but the acting in this film was truly exceptional. Leonardo Di Caprio nailed it, as did all the other actors. I especially want to give props to Jonah Hill. That kid can act. Three stars. Direction was flawless. Each scene was like a visual, audio, and mental diamond of perfect clarity. A gem, in other words. Two stars. Martin Scorsese really, really knows how to build characters and get the audience involved with them. One star. All the exceptional camera work you would expect from one of his films. One star. OMG is Margot beautiful, and she and about 100 other women in this film get naked a lot. This film might have gone 180 minutes but it seems like half of that was with hot naked women on the screen. Thank you for understanding that if you are going to get an R rating anyway you might as well bury the needle. Two stars. Based on a true story. One star. Overall a tremendously worthwhile experience. Three stars. Total: thirteen stars.
The black holes.
I know I will end up with another hot coal shoved up my bottom when I get to movie reviewer hell (or they’ll just force me to watch Jack and Jill again. I think I’d prefer the hot coal) for even suggestion Martin Scorsese do anything different, but honestly he could have use his editing pruning shears more often. This film really could have had 30-45 minutes trimmed without losing any of its force or power. This is what Executive Producers are supposed to be for, but no one would say anything to Mr. Scorsese. One black hole. I personally wanted to see Belfort rot in prison and write this memoir from a cell. The life of excess without repercussions were not only a horrible life lesson but lessened the impact of all the bad behavior. A crime in a film has much more impact if you know the character committing it is seriously risking his life and/or freedom, and once it is established that all Belfort was getting was a slap on the wrist all the tension built up over 150 minutes of film kind of drained away. One black hole. I got used to it fairly soon but Leonardo was rocking a Long Island wise guy accent that kind of ground on me. It was the only part of the film that felt fake. One black hole. Total: three black holes.
A grand total of 10 stars, a very good score for me. This is definitely in my top three for the year and might take overall (I’m working on my end of year recap and ranking). Should you see it? Yes, absolutely. The visuals do not demand a theater but to support good films you should go. Date movie? Honestly no. Too many naked hookers, dysfunctional relationships, and STDs to make a girl feel comfortable getting naked with you. Take her to see something a little more innocuous. Bathroom break? This is an important one as you will need it by the end of the three hours (plus some kind of dopey extended trailer for Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit. Is it really necessary to run your 12 minute segment in addition to all the other trailers, popcorn ads, and interminable turn of your cell phone notices on top of a three hour movie?). Unfortunately there aren’t any scenes readily dismissible. I suppose the sex scene towards the end of the movie after Belfort is busted is probably your best bet. Margot keeps all her clothes on for this one (damn the luck) and the result is reiterated over the next ten minutes. Hurry back though.
Thanks for reading. I just have one more 2013 movie to see (Grudge Match. I thought I would round out 2013 on a low note) and then I will do my top and bottom movies. Follow me on Twitter @Nerdkungfu. Comments on this film or my review can be left her while off topic suggestions or questions can be emailed to [email protected]. Have a great night. Talk to you soon.
Dave
47 Ronin in 3D Review
Everyone seemed to hate this movie. I don’t know. I kind of liked it.
This movie got a miserable 12% on Rotten Tomatoes and a quick scan of other reviewers have it listed as out of genre, boring, unfocused, and underwhelming. In reading the reviews I can see a lot of the things other reviewers have taken issue with, but the fact is as a fan of fantasy films, sword and sorcery, and samurai culture I found myself reasonably entertained. I think I vote more with the audience, who gave it 63%. (47 Ronin image courtesy of the Movie T Shirt collection incidentally)
That’s not to say this film was great or even really good. It tanked horribly and if you aren’t t total nerd you might find a lot of it completely wrong. I think it fair to say if a studio sinks $150 million into a production having them come out with just plain mediocre is tantamount to a crime. Since I kind of skipped right past my annoying detailed analysis in the last review let’s dive into the reasons why I think this movie is floundering.
First off, while the writer has a couple decent credits (Wanted, a lot of the Fast and Furious franchise) he has no real history in a period piece, nor in a film with more import than fast cars are cool and you can’t fight fate. I don’t even want to drop the entirely in his lap. It looks like the studio decided they wanted a film with significance otherwise missing from their lineup and then hired the guy who wrote Tokyo Drift to develop it. This is like deciding you want to throw a fancy dinner party and bringing on the fry cook from the local McDonalds to prepare your food. I’m sure the fries would be delicious but you can’t really blame him when the filet mignon doesn’t really garner mass praise from your guests.
Secondly, this movie makes the cardinal sin of straddling the fantasy/reality fence and ends up with a fence post stuck in its ass. Magic works well in the Lord of the Rings (a movie that clearly “inspired” this production BTW) mainly because Middle Earth is a land of magic and fantasy, with elves, dwarves, trolls, etc. 47 Ronin is sent in feudal Japan and calls back to that fact all the time, but once your brain gets set into reality mode a witch casts a spell or magical bird monks show up. Shifting gears back and forth too often hurts the brains of the audience. Would you really want to see an episode of Sons of Anarchy end by Jackson casting a spell on a rival gang? No, that would be completely out of place. This is especially aggravated by the complete lack of explanation of what the magic is about and who is doing what. If you are going to have magic in a period piece you need to at least attempt to ground it in some kind of established and universally understood lore (voodoo, pact with Satan, eye of newt, etc.). The sad part is the magic added absolutely nothing to the film and really only served to justify the 3D and keep the CGI drones employed.
Before I go into my third point let me preface it by saying I don’t hate Keanu Reeves. He has been responsible for a number of films I have enjoyed a great deal (Matrix, Speed, Devil’s Advocate). However I will say he tends to have a fairly wooden delivery and when he is matched up with a cast comprised entirely of stoic Bushido samurai the film stops looking less like a movie and more like an Animatronic historical reproduction in a new ride at Disneyland. The audience needs a character to identify with and it is far easier to identify with someone showing strong emotion. This was a truly missed opportunity, in that had they cast someone who was the completely contrasting mien emotionally it not only would have given us a protagonist to identify with provide a great context to better understand and appreciate the samurai. This was done very well in The Last Samurai I think, and could have been done well here.
Finally, a lot of people say it was slow and boring but I honestly think the pacing was perfect for showing the culture behind the story. I thought there was plenty of action and as a cultural exploration not a bad experience. I didn’t have a problem with it.
There was one thing the movie did well but that many other people might not have liked is they didn’t “Hollywood” up the ending. I don’t want to spoil it but I kept waiting for the plot to suddenly swerve off the path it was traveling and land in the great unwashed trailer park that is most movie denouements. Unfortunately there is a reason cheesy endings work in mainstream film and the box office return on this movie might be an indication. This bodes ill for future artistic integrity.
Anyway, the story. Kai (Keanu Reeves) is a half breed found by local Japanese lord Asano (Min Tanaka-Return, No Beginning, No End, Kyoto Story) and is raised in relative kindness along with the lord’s daughter Mika (Kô Shibasaki-One Missed Call, Go, Crying Out Love in the Center of the World). He is disliked by all the samurai including Oishi (Hiroyuki Sanada-the Wolverine, Rush Hour 3, the Twilight Samurai) the lord’s right hand man. They all think he is a demon. Their land is beset by a magical beast that Kai helps kill. The creature was summoned by a witch (Rinko Kikuchi-Pacific Rim, the Brothers Bloom (Boom Boom!), the Sky Crawlers) who was working for Lord Asano’s rivel Lord Kira (Tadanobu Asano-Battleship, Thor, Ichi the Killer).
Asano is hosting a tournament for the Shogun (Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa-Planet of the Apes, Pearl Harbor, Mortal Kombat) but the witch casts a spell on Asano’s champion. Kai takes his place against a giant in armor but after he loses the Shogun realizes he is not a samurai and shames Asano. That night the witch casts another spell on Asano, making him attack Kira and shaming him further. The Shogun orders Asano to commit seppuku, leaving Miko to marry Kira and Oishi and the rest of the samurai as ronin.
Eventually Oishi finds Kai as a slave and rescues him. He collects the rest of the ronin and they cook up a plot to take revenge on Kiru. They need weapons and so Kai takes him to the demon/birdman/monks who raised him. Battles are fought, Kai fights the illegitimate love child of Falkor the Luckdragon and Cthulu, and the Shogun shows the world what a dick he is.
The stars.
I thought it a decent movie that kept me at least engaged. One star. The costumes and culture were spot on as far as my ignorant ass knows. One star. Sword fights are always cool. One star. Samurai are also very cool, and they managed to avoid the pitfall of including ninjas in this one. One star. The girl who plays Mika is super hot if you like gorgeous Japanese girls (which I do). One star. Massive props for giving us the ending the story needed, not the one that most American audiences would have wanted. Three stars. Total: eight stars.
The black holes.
There was a lot of stuff that this film didn’t need and detracted from the story. Magic, dragons, mystical birdman monks. One black hole. The whole unresolved fantasy/reality question, which was exacerbated by film techniques more appropriate for sci fi in my opinion. One black hole. Wooden acting all around, some intentional and some accidental. One black hole. No explanation or understanding was given for the super giant samurai working for Lord Kira. Was he mystical? A demon? A big dude who never took off his armor? A big woman who never took off her armor? For some reason that was really bugging me. I wanted to know more. One black hole. Total: four black holes.
A grand total of four stars, which for me is the upper end of the mediocre range. Worth seeing? If you like fantasy movies and/or are into feudal Japan sure. It won’t be a waste of your time. For the rest of you meh. You can take it or leave it. If you are a Keanu Reeves fan maybe, but with the beard he had you don’t even realize it’s him most of the time. However if you are going to see it try to see it on a big screen. 3D wasn’t awesome but did add some. Date movie? Probably not. If she is not into the culture this might put her to sleep. What little romance there was was stunted at best. Nothing here that will really flip the average girls switch.
By the way, if you are a regular reader and look for the whole date movie or not part of my reviews know two things: 1) this is based on my understanding of the average girl and in no way could be considered specific to the individual you are dating and 2) my own success rate in the world of dating is on par with the success rate of dried spaghetti being used to break down a concrete wall. It would be safe to assume that my actual understanding of the average girl is pretty limited (based more on what I read or see in movies than anything else) so take my advice for what it is worth.
Anyway, bathroom break. Nothing jumps out at me but if I were to pick a scene the one where the witch is trying to force feed Mika with her tentacle hair doesn’t do much of anything.
Thanks for reading. Lots to see right now and I want to get more done in time for my end of the year review so tomorrow might be a two movie day. Now that Xmas is done I have time to get caught up. Follow me on Twitter if you dare @Nerdkungfu. Comments on this film or my review can be left here and suggestions or off topic questions should be sent to [email protected]. Have a great day and I will talk to you soon.
Dave
The Hobbit: the Desolation of Smaug in 3D
The Desolation of Tolkien
I have been watching a lot of Supernatural lately. I thought it would bug me and have avoided it to date but have discovered it actually quite fun. I think the main thing that kept me from watching was the fact that “I’d like to buy a vowel” McG is listed as executive producer and I’d rather support a new Black Plague before his film career (for lack of a better term). However it turns out you cannot do as much damage to your audiences upper brain functions as a TV executive producer then as the director of a really crappy movie. (Smaug image courtesy of the Movie T Shirt category)
If you haven’t watched the Winchester brothers solve their paranormal Ghostbusters-esque mysteries than you should know about half the time the villain turns out to be the angry spirit of a long dead human. This spirit usually died in violence or deep emotional distress, although occasionally it is some kind of betrayal or failure to uphold a principle that has angered it. I honestly think that in the world of Supernatural these Hobbit movies would motivate the ghost of J.R.R. Tolkien to rise up from the grave and gruesomely murder everyone involved with the production and distribution, right down to the ushers at the theaters.
The Lord of the Rings movies were a true hommage to the spirit and story of the series. Peter Jackson took the rather dense and florid prose and crafted a wondrous tribute that cut out all the dross and left us with a glorious experience. In the Hobbit it appears he took all that dross and cultivated it in a fermentation tank, growing it to massive proportions and rancidity. He then took his product and injected it into a fairly light children’s dungeon crawl, bloating it to elephantine size and mobility. Bottom line, like trying to wear a condom as a stocking there just isn’t enough material to cover the subject. Tolkien never intended the Hobbit to be as critical and important as any of his other books and in truth seemed to want it to just be fun.
(Note-if any of you blowhards want to tell me that a lot of what is in this movie came from the Silmarillion let me remind you that TOLKIEN DID NOT WRITE THE SILMARILLION! After his death his son collected all his notes and composed them into another money grab. By the way, if you are looking for a challenge try actually read the Silmarillion. It is some of the worst writing ever and if you manage to finish it be sure to stop by the mens room of your local Greyhound station to collect your prize as the Most Boring Person of the Year)
That being said it is a distinct improvement over the first Hobbit. It is more cohesive, has (some) improved character development, and none of the CGI looked like animated Colorforms glued to the inside of the camera lens. However, where this film is a distinct improvement is not in what it has, but rather in what it has not. Let me illustrate:
No singing.
I guess Peter took a moment to actually watch his first film and realized that the dwarfs singing was not going to win any Grammys or start a new musical revolution. Perhaps he heard the gestalt consciousness of humanity screaming in pain as he subjected us to his slow motion eardrum assault.
No Aragorn.
This film wears the characters and situations of the LOTR films like a teenager pasting his pubes to his face in order to simulate facial hair so he can get into a nightclub. I suspect the producers have had many serous meetings over the fact that the title of these films does not actually have the words “lord”, “of”, or “rings” in it (fortunately the word “the” is covered) and based on the assumption that we are all complete inbred idiots feel the need to constantly remind us of the fact that this movie comes from the same source material. This is done with the grace and subtlety of a car battery electroshock treatment to the testicles and gets increasingly annoying as the series progresses. Rumor has it that Viggo Mortensen was approached with some flimsy pretext for including him in this story but wisely decided that was just stupid. Would that Orlando Bloom had made the same decision.
No Gollum.
See above, but I could easily see them shooting a scene where Gollum leaves the Misty Mountains in despair searching for his precious. You know, in case we forgot that he later throws Bilbo under the bus with Sauron.
No mismatched voices.
Remember how in the last film the Goblin King sounded suspiciously like an Oxford professor rather than an actual goblin? I don’t know about you but that voice really took me out of the movie. In this film the voice of Smaug sounds as completely evil and bad ass as you could ever hope to have happen. Props to Bernard Cumberbatch on that.
Less Radagast.
It’s ironic that Radagast’s color is brown, as he is the literal turd in the punchbowl of this series. Like George Lucas with Jar Jar Binks Peter Jackson finally listened to the audience and opted to keep his presence to a minimum, although again like Lucas he still opted to crowbar a cameo in as a big F you to the audience for not falling in love with this animal excrement sodden countenance.
Less Azog the Defiler.
I guess the producers decided since they already had one ginormous super villain with a cool, evil cultured voice in Smaug they didn’t need to keep shoving a character who had no actual part in the book back in our faces. Like Radagast he makes an appearance but then hands off chasing of the dwarves to one of his hench-orcs. For the record most of the villains the dwarves encountered in the book were just rolls on the Wandering Monster Table, but again I guess our soft brains would never accept a goblin army just showing up at the end of the story to steal gold without some connecting master villain. Also this way they can have the battle include a mighty duel where Thorin is almost killed but manages to vanquish Azog (SPOILER ALERT (maybe) note-in what will undoubtedly be a black hole in the next movie when they redo the end of The Return of the King with Thorin as Aragorn, Thorin is mortally wounded at the Battle of Five Armies and dies. Anything else will infuriate me).
So that is what didn’t annoy me. However, experienced readers of my blog will know that I revel in pointing out what sucks, so let’s talk about the things this movie did that made me dream of a better day when film audiences can electroshock writers and directors with the touch of a button in the armrest of the theater seat. This include pretty much everything bad the first movie did that I didn’t mention before plus some. Here are some specifics:
First off, the forcing in of every single character and reference from the LOTR has reached a saturation point, where the references start to crystallize and collect on the bottom of the beaker. Legolas has no business in this film. Gloin never mentioned his son Gimli. The necromancer was a minor subplot and by the way WAS NEVER SAURON. On that same note they brought in Galadriel to do the evil rising opening monolog like this is part of another world encompassing dastardly plot, not chapters 8-15 of a 153 page kids book. For that matter, the forcing of gravitas into what is essentially a pretty light story didn’t do much more than distract from the plot.
All of the characters seem to suffer from some kind of super good sportsmanship brain aneurism where they have the ability to totally overwhelm their opponents at any moment but instead opt to use their secondary talents or abilities. It’s like bringing both a gun and a knife to a gun fight and then choosing to use the a rag ball on the end of a rope you grabbed from a homeless person. Smaug suffered from this the most. He had about 10,000 chances to incinerate both Bilbo or the dwarves but only opted to use his fire when there was a handy wall for them to hide behind. The rest of the time he opted to chase them or be readily distracted by other dwarves. If you read the book (a question that I think could be put fairly to Peter Jackson) you will recall that Biblo stayed invisible the whole time he was talking to Smaug in a wise choice to not be flambeed, but here he thinks the best move is to stand in the open for his dialogue with the fire breathing dragon. Fortunately his stupidity is matched by Smaug, who opts to just talk with him for a while.
I know why they did this, by the way. They wrote themselves into a hole in the LOTR by making anyone wearing the Ring transport into a weird black and white alternate universe where you for some reason you cannot hear normal sound but hear strong wind and/or the screams of the damned. Again, the people making this film don’t think we are smart enough to understand that the Ring gains in power as Sauron does, and was therefore a much more difficult and dangerous thing to wear in the later books but fairly innocuous in this one. This is where movie scripts fall apart IMO. When protagonist and antagonist start doing things that are clearly stupid like not use their inviso-ring or burn a thief to a cinder at the first opportunity then we the audience stop connecting to them, thus forcing us out of the story. No one wants to identify with a character who is flat out dumb, and when the main villain shows how stupid he is the tension bleeds away.
Anyway, another thing that bugged the hell out of me was the battle between the dwarves and Smaug. If you recall the book the dwarves more or less spent the entire time around the Lonely Mountain skulking outside while sending in Bilbo to five finger some gold. There’s no way we can have that in this epic so the obvious answer is to have an battle resembling the illigitamate offspring of a Scooby Doo episode mated with The Three Stooges in Orbit (that’s Curly-Joe Three Stooges BTW) with the delivery doctor being the prop guy from the Three Musketeers. How long do you think it takes to craft several dozen hi explosive grenades from raw material? According to Peter Jackson about 30 seconds. It also takes about 30 seconds to fire up smelting furnaces that haven’t been used in decades and pour a giant gold statue of a dwarf that sublimes directly into liquid somehow (I guess the dwarfs also MacGuvyered up a small nuclear reactor while making the grenades) to spew molten gold all over Smaug.
This fight scene is actually insulting on a couple of levels, not just the one that is a punch in the balls to a true Tolkien fan. You see, it is established fairly early on in the film that Bilbo and all the dwarfs are effectively immortal (SPOILER ALERT again, sort of. In the book in addition to Thorin both Fili and Kili die in the final battle. I’m curious to see if that holds true) and that point is reinforced about 1 minute into this battle with the very first of many highly improbable narrow escape, making the whole episode a mutual masturbation session between the CGI guys and the DP. It becomes a huge waste of time and all we are looking for is what trick the writers will have come up with for the final escape. I honestly got bored.
However, each of these movies has to end with some kind of epic battle and Tolkien was not kind enough to write in yet another one in chapter 12 (I guess he didn’t realize his intro book was due to be made into 11 hours of film. How lacking in foresight) so they had to crowbar in something.
I could go on but I’m already at over 2K words and have been finding writing this almost as much of a grind as watching it. I’m going to skip the story recap. Read chapters 6-12 in the book. Should take you less time than the 161 minutes this film runs. Spiders. Elves. Dwarves. Bear-man. Wizard. Orcs. Dragon. Movie call backs. Blue balls ending.
The stars.
I will say that Smaug, up until his worthless battle against the dwarves, was in all ways truly bad ass. Great CGI (assuming you like brown and gold), and his voice and dialog exceptional. Two stars. The scene between him and Bilbo was the best in the film (when you think about it, the scene between Biblo and Gollum in the last film was the best as well. It almost makes you think that when they stick to the actual story they get the best results…). One star. Casting was in all ways good, although that might be a carry over from the last film. Still, one star. As bitter as I am about this whole series I am still a huge Tolkien fan and love being back in Middle Earth. One star. The barrel chase scene was kind of fun, even if it had way too much Orlando Bloom for no reason. One star. The spiders were kind of cool, although if you stuffer from arachnophobia you might want to take a long bathroom break. One star. I normally don’t give stars for movies that just suck less than the previous one, but this one was a distinct improvement over the first one. Also no singing was huge. One star. Total: nine stars.
The black holes.
Oh, where to begin? Forcing in every single reference and character from the LOTR series (guess what? The Nasgul show up for some reason) into this film like a drug mule getting paid by the ounce for as many heroin filled condoms shoved into his assorted orifices. Two black holes. SPOILER ALERT a bonus black hole for making the Necromancer turn out to be none other than…Sauron! Yes, he makes his appearance almost in the flesh for…some reason? It’s things like that that make me wish he had won at the end of The Return of the King. One black hole. Apparently the sexed up inbred lowbrow apes that we the audiences are cannot see a film without a hot chick and some kind of romance so they invented a girl elf who falls in love with…a dwarf. Yes, it’s that sad. Not only does that not stem from anything Tolkien wrote but goes against every bit of common lore associated with dwarves and elves ever in the myth and history of this world or any alternate world you want to name. Also completely unnecessary. Two black holes for being extra insulting. Remember the Black Arrow of Bard the Bowman? How it was his lucky arrow that he had inherited from his father and never failed him? Now Black Arrows are magical ballista bolts that at one point were crafted at will. I don’t know why this bugs me so much but it does. One black arrow, I mean hole. While there was less of Radagast he was still there and a turd in the bowl doesn’t have to be big in order to ruin the punch. One black hole. The fight scene at the end between Smaug and the dwarves was dumb, dopey, and totally worthless. One black hole. Pacing was kind of awful. The dwarves head into Mirkwood and in the course of about 1 minute go from well equipped and put together to Tom Hanks in the second half of Castaway. In the book there were weeks of travel and a slow degredation. One black hole. The grenades were annoying, and WTF was the golden statue deal? Was it liquid that was held in place by the “magic” of the dwarves or was it solid that somehow had 100,000 pounds of white phosphorus hidden inside? Why were the dwarves crafting a giant gold bomb statue anyway? One black hole. The 3D did nothing except lighten my wallet a little more. One black hole. Trying to make the story of the Hobbit into something way more important that it ever was. One black hole. Continuing to stretch this story in a blatant attempt to get more money from us. Say what you will about Harry Potter or Twilight going two parts but at least they were both based on full length novels. One black hole. And finally SPOILER ALERT in another case of massive cinema blue balls the epic battle of Smaug destroying Laketown (or Dale) that I was more or less hoping for ever since the last film failed miserably never happened. The film ends with Smaug in flight towards Laketown. Remember how in Star Wars one of the main reasons we all kept going was to finally see Darth Vader in all his glory and all we got was a 30 second scene where he utters one line and one word and then throws a Force temper tantrum? This is on par with that, and on par with Peter Jackson channeling the energy of whatever demon possessed Lucas. For this alone go screw yourself Jackson. Two black holes. Total: fifteen black hole.
So a final total of six black holes. This has been literally my most painful review to write to date. I really, really want to like these movies. I love the LOTR movies and all Tolkiens books. I actually saw this over a week ago and have been grinding through this. My motivation to finish is at an all time low. Should you see it? I say with utmost grudgingness yes. If you are a fan of the series you will need to see this, if only to see how bad it is. However, I feel exactly like I did the first Hobbit; now that I have seen it I feel no need to ever see it again. The LOTR movies I rewatch with compulsive regularity but this one has no replay value. I find myself resenting the brain cells dedicated to remembering it. See it if you are a fan and then move on. Date movie? Only if she is really into Tolkien and hobbits (if she is only into hobbits I hate to break it to you but you have a whole slew of other problems on deck). Bathroom break? Most of the scenes in Laketown before the dwarves head to the Lonely Mountain are totally expendable in spite of Stephen Fry’s best efforts.
Ugh. I need to see something to wash the taste of that one out. I’ll go see Anchorman tonight. Thanks for reading, and thanks for being patient with me on this. I know it has been a while. Follow me on Twitter @Nerdkungfu. If you agree or disagree with me feel free to post a comment here, and if you have an off topic question or suggestion feel free to email me at [email protected]. Have a great night.
Dave
Star Trek Retrospective: Episode 76 The Cloud Minders
This is one of those episodes I only vaguely remember seeing as a kid and therefore was not a huge influence on my life. However, seeing it as an adult reminded me of the kinds of chances Roddenberry took with the show. You see, this episode was a clear comment on modern class and economic disparity. There were other shows that addressed class, but never had such a pro socialist message been delivered.
In a sense it’s kind of weird. Other episodes had been so pro America (Tomorrow is Yesterday and the Omega Glory) and anti hippy and alternative government (The Way to Eden) that this might seem at odds with the overriding message of Star Trek, but in truth the universe of Star Trek has always had a strong socialist trend. There is no real use of money (except Mudd’s Women I guess) and later on in TNG it is plain that in a society capable of producing enough resources for everyone there is no need for economic oppression. Still, the very pro blue collar message of this one seemed off a bit to me.
Not one of the best, but not horrible. The sky city was super cool, and there were plenty of fights with the miners to let Kirk show off his shoulder-roll martial expertize. The anger gas idea was cool, and an equitable solution was found in true Roddenberry fashion. Seems like a lot of Star Trek takes place in mines and caves, but I guess that’s really what the budget allowed (mine image courtesy of the movie t shirt category). They can’t all have massive painted backdrops I guess.
Dave
Machete Kills Movie Review
Killer of fun.
I, like many people, enjoy frozen yogurt. I usually go for french vanilla with strawberries and those mini M&M’s, or sometimes Reeces Pieces. I don’t do it often as it can be a lot of calories, but find it to be a nice treat for when I’m feeling self indulgent or am dealing with getting dumped (I guess I do eat a lot of frozen yogurt).
If the original Machete were my nice cup of frozen yogurt (and the trailer from Grindhouse the free sample on a wooden spoon) than Machete Kills is a water tower full of rancid yogurt with the output hose inserted into my mouth and turned on full blast until I have yogurt spurting from every orifice, ruining yogurt for ever and probably giving me diabetes. I’m sure you’ve heard of too much of a good thing, but this is too much of a bad thing that is supposed to be good but in the end is just bad.
(Machete poster from the Movie Tshirt category)
Don’t get me wrong. I am a big Danny Trejo fan, and think he is a great character actor. I loved him in Heat and From Dusk ’till Dawn, and he has been in at least two different zombie movies. I enjoyed Machete in that special bad/good sense that seems to guarantee cult movie status, and am glad his career has taken off. I hope to see him in any number of future productions.
I also used to be a Robert Rodriguez fan, but he seems to suffer from the same brain chemistry imbalance that Luc Besson has in that his movies fall apart as soon as he tries to do a sequel. El Mariachi is frickin’ brilliant, but Desperado was laughable. Machete was great but this one sucks. He is working on a sequel to Sin City and now I worry about that franchise. For every good film he has done (usually teamed up with Quentin Tarotino) he has also done a couple crappy ones, mostly comprised of the whole Spy Kids franchise.
I think the best word to describe this film is juvenile. It plays out like two 11 year old kids playing with action figures. I know it is supposed to be a parody of cheesy action movies, but if you try to make a movie to make fun of crappy acting, story, action, filming, and editing by using all those elements in the end you get a movie with crappy acting, story, action, filming, and editing. It’s like if I wanted to make a joke about how much feces smells and took a crap on your dining room table to illustrate my point. The joke is surely funny in my head but at the end of the day you are dealing with a ruined table and your fist hurting from punching me in the face over and over again. To the average viewer (i.e. not Robert Rodriguez) you really can’t see anything except the crap.
I suspect this is going to be one of those bear trap movies for hipsters. What do I mean by that? It’s like the Star Wars Holiday Special, a movie that should never be watched by any human on the planet. However, every year jackasses like me think something like “Sure, it will suck, but I’ll gain some kind of nerd credibility for having watched it and really, it has Luke, Han, and Leia in it so how bad can it be?” only to find that there is nothing in there but pain and suffering. This movie isn’t necessarily as bad as that but if you feel like you need to see it just to maintain your bad movie watching status don’t waste your time.
(By the way, at this point I have to caution you to not misinterpret that last paragraph as my recommendation that you actually watch the SWHS. Some things once watched can never be unseen, and there is nothing to be found in that film except a steady draining of your will to live. If you have any love of Star Wars, film in general, or your childhood you will avoid it. That being said I know there is some idiot out there who will disregard all my warnings and go for it. To you I say you have been warned.)
When I first started watching this film I thought I might have to do one of my double reviews; once as a legitimate (haw!) film critic and once as a fan of camp movies. However, by the end of it I realized I hated this film from both perspectives. Fans of camp are fans of fun, and this movie is not fun. It is ploddish and looks like it was filmed in someones back yard. The brilliant timing, parody, and insight that Tarantino brings to a movie like this are missing entirely, leaving something a failing film student might have done (except for the fact that Rodriguez did el Mariachi as a film student and it was infinitely better than this).
The story, in addition to being bad, is convoluted as hell. I’ll run over the highlights. Machete (Danny Trejo-Heat, From Dusk ’till Dawn, Anchorman) is accused of killing his partner in a rogue US Army-sells-guns-to-a-drug-cartel-but-gets-busted-by-special-forces-and-the-local-sheriff raid gone bad and is going to be lynched by the local hillbilly lawman. In spite of the fact that the lynching is completely illegal and secret the president (Carlos Estevez (Charlie Sheen)-Hot Shots, Two and a Half Men, Wall Street) calls to recruit him. He is sent to Mexico after a mad revolutionary Mendez (Demian Bichir-A Better Life, Savages, the Heat) who wants to blow up Washington DC with a missile (or something. It all kind of blurs together after a while). He travels to Mexico with the help of his beauty queen handler Miss San Antonio (Amber Heard-Zombieland, Pineapple Express, Drive Angry), the most fake character in a movie of characters that felt fake. There he goes to a brothel run by Desdemona (Sofia Vergara-the Smurfs, Four Brothers, Modern Family), a sadistic madame who has a stable of murderous psychotic super vixens. The last contact with Mendez is her daughter Cereza (Vanessa Hudgens-Sucker Punch, Spring Breakers, High School Musical). Desdemona gets her crew to try to kill Machete for some reason (?) while her daughter agrees to help him for some other reason (??).
They escape and are picked up in a helicopter by Mendez’s henchmen. Cereza is killed for some reason (???) but Machete is allowed to live in order to hear Mendez’s megalomaniacal rant (if you’ve ever seen Dr. Evil than this scene should be shockingly familiar). Turns out the missile aimed at Washington is hooked to a detonator attached to a deadman switch on his heart. Machete captures him but rather than just destroy the missile or calling in an airstrike he opts to try to find the one man in the world who can disarm it. Mendez has put a contract out on himself for some reason (????) and Machete so now everyone in Mexico wants to kill them, including La Cameleon (played alternatively by Walter Goggins, Cuba Gooding Jr, Antonio Banderas, and Lady Gaga).
Ugh. Remember when I said this movie was like two boys playing with action figures? At some point the boys decided Machete had to fight a million Mexican police, drive an armored car, have Sofia Vergara shoot bullets at him out of two mini mini guns in the tips of her metal bra and then out of a pistol in her crotch that she fires by thrusting her pelvis, cut off a bunch of heads, and sleep with every woman on the screen. Mendez gets killed but his heart is connected to a respirator to keep the missile from firing. When things get slow they introduce the real villain Voz (Mel Gibson-the Road Warrior, Braveheart, Lethal Weapon), who is a super genius who wants to blow up the world so he can live on his satellite with a bunch of kidnapped Mexican slave labor (nothing helps establish the plot of the movie like introducing the villain 3/4 of way through the film). Machete kills a bunch of people usually by cutting off their heads. Rodriguez thinks of the joke of having a bad guy thrown into the whirling blades of a helicopter and then decides the only way it could be funnier is if he repeated it 20 more times. Stuff blows up, Machete kills more people, and the movie is left with a cliffhanger in a clear prelude for Machete 3 like a kid begging for five more minutes of TV before going to bed.
That might be my worst recap ever, but trust me when I say I don’t have a lot to work with and am already bored writing this. Let’s get to the fun part, shall we?
The stars:
Danny Trejo is pretty cool, and while you get fairly tired of his character by end of the film I still like him. One star. All the women were drop dead gorgeous, and as lame as it sounds I do get turned on by girls with guns. One star. If his goal truly was to make a crappy movie than I would have to say Robert Rodriguez succeeded in spades. One star. Total: three stars.
The black holes:
The “plot” was like a Mad Lib story where the only words you could use were “guns”,” kill”, “tits, “machete”, “decapitated”, “whore”, and “Mexican”. Two black holes. There were a couple of times it seemed like some decent acting could have been had from some of the actors (Damian Bichir and Mel Gibson, for the most part) the combination of the horrible roles and the average effort put in (cough cough phoned it in cough cough) made me wish I were watching the Vagina Monologs as played by the Thunderbirds cast using the robot voice from Wargames. God awful. One black hole. As amusing as I find his rants I am going to say that Charlie Sheen was a particularly painful bamboo shoot under the fingernail part of this film. One black hole. Remember how the original Machete was rated R and consequently had some nudity? Well, we wouldn’t want anything interesting to taint the horrible experience of watching this film so rated R with nobody naked. One black hole. Editing and pacing from hell. There is a 24 hour countdown clock going for a lot of the film and about six weeks worth of stuff happened in that time. At the same time the editing was rushed with less than critical but jarringly elements missing. Overall a convoluted editing failure. Two black holes. Really kind of boring. 107 minutes and you will feel every one of them. One black hole. A parody of bad film making that really only subjected us to a bad film. One black hole. Action from hell, with recurring sequences all derived from other, better films. One black hole. Leaving the film as a cliffhanger with a plea for us to see the next horrible version. One black hole. At the end of the film it really felt like a waste of time. Two black holes. Total: thirteen black holes.
A grand total of ten black holes. Honestly the only reasons to see this film is if you are a screaming Machete, Rodriguez, or camp fan and even then you will lose more respect than you gain. In general a big waste of time with very little redeeming. Date movie? Do I really need to answer that for you? Bathroom break? Pretty much anywhere. The best scenes all had Mel Gibson in them so if you want to get something out of this try to do your business around him. Not a lot to miss in this film.
Thanks for reading. I don’t feel good about dumping on this film. I love camp and wanted this to be either really good or that special kind of bad that is actually good but it was neither. Follow me on Twitter @Nerdkungfu. Comments about this film or my review can be left right here, and if you have an off topic question or suggestion feel free to email me at [email protected]. Talk to you soon.
Dave
The Grandmaster Movie Review
Occasionally I will get someone asking me how I came up with the name of my nerd t-shirt selling website, NerdKungFu.com. The first part is painfully obvious to anyone who talks to me for more than 5 minutes (especially if they make the mistake of asking me how I feel about the new Star Trek reboot). But why kung fu? Have I studied martial arts? Am I a disciple of the kung fu philosophy? Once in a while I’ll get some wing nut who asks me if I sell martial arts supplies and uniforms.
The truth is much lamer than any of those. As a kid the thing I watched second only to Star Trek was Kung Fu Theater. My best friend and I had the schedule worked out where we could watch six hours back to back. I love them. Naturally I am a huge fan of the great Bruce Lee, but if you really want to get into the nitty gritty of of what kung fu films are about you have to get into the hard core Wu Tang stuff. Master of the Flying Guillotine will always be my favorite, but you can’t go wrong with the Five Deadly Venoms, Drunken Master, 36th Chamber of Shaolin, or Five Fingers of Death (by the way, if you want to watch any of these I found this great site WatchKungfu.com. Awesome. I think when I am done writing this I will watch 36th Chamber again).
Kung fu movies are fairly formulaic (the good ones at least). Typically an everyman hero is wronged by bandits or local officials. He travels to find a martial arts master (often ending up at the Shaolin temple) where he goes through a very cool series of training exercises in order to become a deadly martial arts master. He then travels home and kicks some ass. In some movies the martial arts hero dies to save other people (these film are all a product of Communist China and therefore have a very strong social and egalitarian slant. The hero is usually the one protecting people from Imperialist oppression).
Bruce Lee films take these to the next level, with all the above plus the fact that Bruce Lee is amazing. The point of this long intro was I went to this film hoping to see a kung fu movie and was a little disappointed. It was more of a documentary of the great Master Ip Man, the original trainer for Bruce Lee.
I don’t really want to do the full black holes/stars thing for this. When it comes to reviewing this I am up the cultural river without a paddle. I’m sure many of the issues I noticed would look totally cool to someone living in China. The film just didn’t have a lot of weight behind it. The martial arts sequences were abreviated, and I was kind of disappointed to see them using the quick cut action sequencing that has been plaguing Western movies for years now. In other words, instead of amazingly choreographed fight sequences (like in the Raid: Redemption) we get a lot of 1-5 second shots (still an improvement on most Hollywood films, where the cuts are 1-1.5 second) shots edited together. The film also didn’t have the amazing camera work I have come to expect from modern Chinese martial arts movies like in Hero. However, the story, while kind of flat, was interesting and there was actual martial arts action in it.
I think the best way to appreciate this film is as a cultural study with kung fu in it. There were some intriguing decisions made by the main characters that wouldn’t make a lot of sense here in America but when taken with the Chinese culture in mind are kind of cool. And don’t get me wrong. There are some great fight sequences (the first fight in the rain at the beginning and later between Gong Er and Ma San at the train station in particular).
I think my frustration with this film is it is really hard to nail down. It doesn’t have enough fighting or the fanciful story to be a true kung fu movie; the story is too flat and broken up into documentary style vignettes to be a great drama; and the camera work is not lavish enough to be an artistic piece. Ip Man is of course a great character but I the film glossed over the dramatic turns in his life (leaving his family, dealing with the invasion of the Japanese, etc.) leaving me with a hard time identifying with him. I had a better connection to his love interest Gong Er, but even her story arc was flat. I did enjoy this film a great deal, but there were parts I found myself wishing for a fast forward button for.
The story is of course about Master Ip Man of the Wing Chun school of Kung Fu. He is selected to match up against the Northern martial arts head. He wins the challenge (by literally breaking bread) but is challenged also by the Northern Masters daughter Gong Er. They fight and Gong Er wins on a technicality. During the fight the two both feel amazing chemistry for each other, but Ip Man has to go home to his wife and kids.
Ip Man and Gong Er plan to meet up and spar again but before they can the Japanese invade. Ip Man is forced to take up work as his family starves. Meanwhile Gong Er’s father Gong Yutian is betrayed and killed by his pupil Ma San, now a Japanese collaborator. Gong Er hunts him down and they fight at a train station. Eventually Ip Man travels to Hong Kong to find work, only to be cut off from his family when the Communist government closes the border. He meets up with Gong Er and thinks to rekindle their relationship but she has sworn an oath of celibacy. Eventually he opts to open a Wing Chun school in Hong Kong in order to make kung fu available to the general public and there trains young Bruce Lee. Thanks to him Wing Chun is the most widely used school of kung fu.
I’m not going to get into the stars and black holes on this one. Like I said, I don’t think I have the proper cultural basis to properly appreciate it. I’ve discovered that once I get any film onto my autopsy table I tend to find birth defects and cancers I didn’t even see while watching it, and I don’t want to do treat this film that way. Besides, the answer to the question should you see it or not is very simple. If you are a fan of Bruce Lee or kung fu movies then absolutely. If you are not then feel free to give it a pass. The quick cut action means you can probably get away with seeing it at home so wait for NetFlix.
Sorry about the lame review, but this film kind of defies my reviewing power. I will be seeing Blue Jasmine later tonight so look for that review tomorrow. I have a couple hours to kill before the movie so I am going to watch 36th Chamber of Shaolin (aka Shaolin Master Killer) and enjoy every second. Follow me on Twitter @NerdKungFu. If you have comments on this movie or my review post them here, and off topic questions or suggestion can be emailed to [email protected]. Have a great night.
Dave
P.S. Riddick tomorrow night. Stop pestering me about it.